The Latest Breaking News from Rahimi

Read each of the opinions in only 33 pages.

A few practical thoughts for future cases (all bold emphasis added): [1.] The Court solidly accepts (with only Justice Thomas dissenting) that "the Second Amendment permits the disarmament of individuals who pose a credible threat to the physical safety of others," at least after a judicial finding of such threat.…

a contrary view to Josh's

If the government must “square corners” to protect illegal aliens and convicted criminals, Constitutional protections for Americans deserve consistent application.

Courts are "not insensitive to domestic violence" but are "sensitive to the constitutional rights of the accused."

Will Garland v. Range be the way to go?

In an upcoming Supreme Court case, the Cato Institute argues that the "threadbare procedures" required by federal law provide inadequate protection for constitutional rights.

The Government’s reply brief contains a host of mistakes, some quite elementary.

Bruen directs the proper approach to historical analogue laws in Rahimi.