The Latest Breaking News from NetChoice

The mandate required platforms to, among other things, report to the state "how the terms of service define and address (a) hate speech or racism; (b) extremism or radicalization; (c) disinformation or misinformation; (d) harassment; and (e) foreign political interference, as well as statistics on content that was flagged by…

There is little here that can't be gleaned from the docket and the split opinions.

In a lawsuit, the industry groups argue a new state law violates First Amendment free speech rights.

Opponents say they will challenge on constitutional grounds bills intended to protect kids online that are set for a Senate vote.

The right to keep and bear arms remains a second-class right.

I don't get the random questions Justice Barrett raises, and I'm not sure why she didn't mention her reservations in Hansen..

I think it is clear that Justice Alito lost the majority, but the resulting schizophrenic opinions still do not cohere.

And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.

It was not the Fifth Circuit.

Alito had only four majority opinions this term, while Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan all had seven.

As the Moody v. NetChoice majority noted, the parties focused on Facebook's and YouTube's main feeds. The majority similarly focused on those main feeds in its extensive discussion of First Amendment principles, and, as co-blogger Ilya notes, it left little doubt about the unconstitutionality of the Texas and Florida statutes…