The Latest Breaking News from Lawfare

It explains why the IEEPA "Liberation Day" tariffs are illegal and how our case against them relates to the other three cases challenging Trup's tariffs.

I'm participating in this in-person event today at the Georgetown Law Center in D.C., and Lawfare is posting the articles… The post Lawfare AI Liability Symposium appeared first on Reason.com.

I was one of the critics he responded to, and in this post I offer a rejoinder.

Recent articles by Lawfare and Walter Olson perform a valuable service on this front.

"To be clear, we mean no disrespect to either of these fine academics but their views on this matter are idiosyncratic."

Bragg’s argument may harm Trump in the removal case, but in the long run, this argument could help Trump in future political disqualification-related litigation under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Seth Barrett Tillman and I discuss whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute.

Once again, a jury shows they're more interested in punishing the seditious generals than the foot soldiers

From the Lawfare blog (link to my paper revised): If someone lies about you, you can usually sue them for defamation. But what if that someone is ChatGPT? Already in Australia, the mayor of a town outside Melbourne has threatened to sue OpenAI because ChatGPT falsely named him a guilty…