The Latest Breaking News from Adam Liptak

The New York Times examines the "sharp partisan divides" on the Supreme Court's interim docket.

Rushing out opinions can lock in erroneous conclusions and create problematic precedent.

Recent New York Times reporting about the Court's deliberations on the case modestly reinforces the view that the Court ruled that disqualification from office-holding under Section 3 requires congressional legislation.

How did Roberts come to write Trump v. Anderson, Fischer v. United States, and Trump v. United States?

Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak of the New York Times have published a remarkable story about Dobbs that reports on private correspondences, votes at conference, and more. This post will highlight sixteen of the largest disclosures, and close with some broader thoughts. And I've presented this narrative in (roughly) chronological…

I'm delighted to report (as Adam Liptak wrote in today's New York Times) that the ACLU will be representing the NRA in this important First Amendment case, and that the ACLU's Legal Director David Cole—an experienced Supreme Court advocate—is (the Times notes) planning on arguing. The issue in the case…

Is testimony over Zoom consistent with a criminal defendant's Constitutional rights?

Pro-tip: If you are sued, and you expect your insurer to pick up the bill, it is a good idea to give them timely notice.

Case being considered by US Supreme Court among several likely to make history break with precedent, writes Andrew Buncombe