Katy Perry is facing mounting backlash over her high-profile legal battle with 85-year-old disabled veteran Carl Westcott, in a case critics say highlights the clash between celebrity privilege and elderly homeowners' rights. The dispute centres on Westcott's Santa Barbara mansion, which Perry bought in 2020 for £11.8 million ($15 million) through her business manager. Westcott, diagnosed with late-stage dementia and Huntington's disease, later sought to rescind the sale, claiming he had been recovering from surgery, under heavy medication, and unfit to sign the contract.
In December 2023, a judge sided with Perry, ruling there was no evidence Westcott lacked capacity to sell. But tensions escalated when Perry countersued for £2.56 million ($3.25 million) in lost rental income, later raising the claim to £4.26 million ($5.4 million) over alleged property damage. Westcott's son has accused the 'Roar' singer of 'fighting a dying man in court', while supporters have pushed for a proposed 'Perry Law' to protect vulnerable homeowners.
Reminder that Katy Perry is a terrible person and there’s a CA law named after her because she ripped off so many old people in real estate transactions. https://t.co/7tOP2kGvDI
— Hard Pass (@HardPass4) August 7, 2025
She also sued a group of nuns (no joke) and one died in court fighting her lawsuit.
— Hard Pass (@HardPass4) August 7, 2025
A Nun!!https://t.co/D6myjAawsg
Phase two of the trial begins on 21 August, with the case now a lightning rod for debates over morality, wealth, and the ethics of high-value property deals. For Westcott's family, it is a fight for dignity; for Perry, it is about legal rights and financial claims.
