The Latest Breaking News from the Supreme Court

It was a decision based on oral information that may have set off a chain of convictions in a MCOCA court in the 2006 Mumbai blasts case. An order that was overturned nearly a decade later by the Bombay High Court, and now stayed by the Supreme Court. 

COMMENT: My trans friends are under attack like never before – not least thanks to the Supreme Court’s ruling about the legal definition of what is a ‘woman’. In a challenging climate, allyship is the least I can offer, says Kat Brown

The investment bank thinks a 9–0 ruling against Trump is likely. That doesn’t mean the tariffs will just go away.

All modern U.S. presidents, both Republican and Democratic, have attempted to reduce the population of millions of undocumented immigrants. But their various strategies have not had significant results, with the population hovering around 11 million from 2005 to 2022.

"For good reason, the Constitution vests the 'judicial Power' in 'one supreme Court,' to which all others are 'inferior Courts.'"

The court ruled that a nationwide injunction is the only way to provide complete relief to the state government plaintiffs in the case.

In a scathing rebuke that’s sending shockwaves through financial markets, 27 prominent economists have filed an amicus brief dismantling the economic foundation of President Donald Trump’s emergency tariff powers. Their message couldn’t be clearer: the administration’s justification for sweeping trade duties is built on economic quicksand.

The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts

Trial of the Century! See the Billionaire Media Titans Wrestling in the Mud! Coming to your screens this Fall!

The judgment is not surprising, since the president's reading of the 14th Amendment contradicts its text and history, plus 127 years of Supreme Court precedent.

The Supreme Court has blocked a lower-court ruling in a redistricting dispute in North Dakota that would gut a landmark federal civil rights law for millions of people