The Latest Breaking News from Plaintiff

Lawyers for the controversial influencer, who is also facing sexual misconduct charges in Britain, have denied the allegations.

A federal court, however, has now largely blocked this restriction; the court rejected the argument that the parent violated the school's "bullying" policy.

Exclusive: The terms of the settlement were not disclosed, and the former anchor declined to comment other than to say that the case had been resolved and she was satisfied.

From Thursday's decision by Judge Clifton Corker (E.D. Tenn.) in Williams v. Alkermes, Inc.: Defendant Alkermes, Inc. is a large… The post Case Alleging Race-Based Firing of White Male Manager Accused of Physical Misconduct by Black Female Employee Can Go Forward appeared first on Reason.com.

“Plaintiff has not conducted this litigation as though it involves matters of a highly sensitive and personal nature—instead, she would cloak herself in pseudonymity, and the protections it affords, while publicly lobbing allegations at Defendant by name.”

But "[n]othing in Plaintiff's conclusory assertions suggest that Plaintiff could plead facts plausibly linking his identity with that of the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto."

From Friday's decision by Fulton County (Ga.) Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney in Judicial Watch v. Willis: Plaintiff submitted an… The post Fee Award in Judicial Watch's Georgia Open Records Act Lawsuit Against Fani Willis appeared first on Reason.com.

The lawsuit is brought by Jacki Pick against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, based on statement in Raffensperger's book, Integrity Counts.

Latest efforts by rapper’s lawyer come after a judge rejected attempts to have the plaintiff’s anonymity lifted

The prisoner had argued that other inmates were accessing the case documents, and as a result were urging other inmates to beat, rape, and kill the prisoner, apparently because of information in the court file related to the crime of which the prisoner had been convicted.

This further adds to the split among Manhattan federal judges as to pseudonymity in the various Doe v. Combs cases.