The Latest Breaking News from Fifth Circuit

The laws require major social media platforms to host content they disapprove of for substantive reasons.

The badly flawed lower court ruling defies the Supreme Court's landmark 2019 decision forbidding such Catch-22 traps, and threatens the property rights of large numbers of people.

Monday, the Fifth Circuit panel that decided Missouri v. Biden—which held that some federal government actions improperly "coerced or significantly encouraged" platforms to restrict certain user speech—issued an order saying that it granted a petition for rehearing. This meant that the panel would likely reconsider the decision, though it wasn't…

Music theory, cell phone seizures, and gratuitous strip searches.

Prayer trails, controlled burns, and copyrighted law.

The Fifth Circuit was right to rule it was illegal for the federal government to coerce social media firms, but wrong to uphold a Texas law requiring those firms to post material they prefer to keep out.

3,000 years of overdetention, chief lickspittle, and the wrong side of the road.

Detroit's forfeiture machine, major nuclear questions, and copyrightable materials.

The lawyer's true superpower is to turn every case into a case about procedure.

Zombie jokes, perplexing paths, and a handsy officer.

The post led to the author being arrested for "terrorizing"; so clearly unconstitutional that the police officer lacks qualified immunity, says the Fifth Circuit.