A growing number of older adults are entering or returning to the rental market. Whether due to downsizing, divorce, rising home costs, or lifestyle changes, many Americans over 60 are seeking leases, not retirement homes. But an alarming trend is emerging: some landlords are quietly refusing to rent to seniors. It’s rarely stated outright, but the signs are there—longer application reviews, vague rejections, or sudden unavailability.
While fair housing laws in the U.S. technically protect against age discrimination, the reality is murkier. Landlords are finding subtle workarounds to avoid renting to older tenants, and it’s having real consequences for the growing population of senior renters. As housing becomes more competitive and rents climb, being over 60 has become an unspoken red flag in the eyes of some property owners.
Here’s why some landlords are turning away tenants over 60, and why it’s a much bigger issue than most realize.
Why Some Landlords Now Refuse Tenants Over the Age of 60
Ageism Hidden Behind Financial Excuses
Many landlords say the quiet part out loud: they’re worried older tenants will become a financial burden. Concerns range from fixed incomes and potential late payments to fears that older tenants may die during the lease or require costly accommodations.
While these concerns may sound practical on the surface, they often stem from deep-seated ageist assumptions. Plenty of renters in their 60s, 70s, and beyond have stable Social Security or pension income, excellent credit, and a consistent payment history. Yet they’re often judged more harshly than younger applicants who may have volatile income or limited rental history.
Landlords might not write “too old” on an application, but they can easily favor another applicant under the guise of financial “risk.” It’s an excuse that masks discrimination, and it’s growing more common.
Fear of Medical Emergencies and Liability
Some landlords hesitate to rent to seniors because they fear medical emergencies will become their responsibility, or worse, a liability. Stories about tenants being found deceased in units or requiring emergency services are shared among landlords like urban legends. This creates a fear-driven bias that older tenants come with more potential “problems.”
In reality, tenants of any age can experience medical issues. Yet, seniors are more likely to be unfairly judged as fragile or burdensome. Landlords may worry about needing to deal with ambulance calls, family members, or even potential lawsuits should something go wrong on their property.
Rather than seeing seniors as capable and independent adults, some landlords reduce them to health risks—an unfair and deeply dehumanizing viewpoint.
Misconceptions About Property Wear and Tear
You’d think a 65-year-old retiree would be less likely to throw a party or punch holes in the wall compared to a college student. But some landlords operate under a very different assumption. They worry that seniors will “wear down” properties through mobility aids like walkers or scooters, or by requesting modifications like grab bars or non-slip flooring.
In many cases, landlords assume these accommodations will cost money or reduce the property’s market value for the next tenant. Instead of making minor adjustments that could help aging renters live safely, they opt to avoid renting to them altogether.
This concern reveals a greater problem in the rental industry: a lack of willingness to invest in long-term, stable tenants, especially if they don’t fit the ideal young, mobile demographic.
The Problem of “Long-Term” Tenants
Landlords often want tenants who will stay long enough to be stable but not so long that they can no longer raise the rent or easily evict them. Seniors, particularly those over 60, may be viewed as too permanent.
In rent-controlled areas or buildings with strong tenant protections, landlords sometimes see seniors as future “problems.” They fear a situation where an older tenant lives in a unit for decades at below-market rent, making it harder for the landlord to increase income over time. In these cases, landlords may prefer younger tenants who they believe will move on more quickly or be easier to remove when needed. Ironically, stability, a trait landlords claim to value, is now being weaponized against older renters.
Assumptions About Technology and Communication
Another subtle reason some landlords avoid older tenants is the belief that they’ll be harder to communicate with. From online rental platforms to app-based maintenance systems, the rental process is increasingly digitized. Some landlords assume seniors won’t be able to navigate these tools, preferring “low-maintenance” tenants who can text, pay online, and handle minor issues through automated systems.
This assumption is outdated. Most seniors today are tech-savvy enough to handle online payments, email communication, and smartphone apps. But the stereotype lingers, and it leads landlords to unfairly prioritize younger renters who fit the digital-native mold, even if the senior applicant is more responsible and reliable.
Insurance and Legal Misunderstandings
Landlords sometimes believe that renting to seniors opens them up to more legal responsibility, particularly around accessibility. They fear being forced to make structural changes, accommodate wheelchairs, or be sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—even though the ADA typically applies to public spaces, not private rentals.
This fear is often rooted in misinformation. Fair housing laws do require landlords to allow “reasonable accommodations” at the tenant’s expense, but they are not obligated to fund costly renovations unless it’s federally subsidized housing. Still, the confusion causes many landlords to err on the side of exclusion rather than education.
By misunderstanding or misrepresenting the law, landlords end up gatekeeping access to seniors who are simply looking for a safe and affordable place to live.
Silent Rejection Through Bureaucracy
Even when discrimination isn’t overt, landlords use indirect methods to deter senior renters. These include:
- Requiring high income-to-rent ratios even when a tenant has stellar credit
- Asking for multiple years of work history when the applicant is retired
- Suddenly pulling listings after a senior inquires
- Delaying application responses until the tenant gives up
This paper trail-free discrimination is nearly impossible to prove and rarely challenged. Seniors are left feeling confused, discouraged, and increasingly shut out of a rental market that doesn’t seem to want them.
A Systemic Crisis for Aging Renters
As more Baby Boomers retire and downsize, the rental market is ill-equipped to support their needs or even to welcome them. Many seniors are priced out of homeownership but are also pushed out of rentals, leading to housing insecurity that no generation should face in their later years.
The bigger issue is that this isn’t just about landlords. It’s about an entire system that fails to prioritize aging with dignity. From the way rental apps are designed to how units are built, seniors are often excluded from housing systems that were never designed with them in mind.
Without stronger protections, better education for landlords, and more inclusive housing options, the silent discrimination against older renters will only grow worse.
Discrimination Is Real
Discriminating against tenants over the age of 60 isn’t just unethical. It’s unsustainable. As the population ages, landlords and housing policymakers must confront the quiet ways ageism is infiltrating the rental market. Stability, reliability, and community should be valued, not rejected, just because someone collects Social Security instead of a paycheck.
Have you or someone you know faced challenges renting later in life? How do you think we can make the housing market more age-inclusive?
Read More:
Evictions Soaring: What Landlords Aren’t Telling You
If Your Landlord Does These 5 Things, You May Need to Withhold The Rent
