Forced to hide her true self, Joe Horras’ transgender daughter struggled with depression and anxiety until three years ago when she began gender-affirming treatment. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision allowing Idaho to enforce its ban on such care for minors has left families like Horras' in a state of uncertainty. The law subjects physicians to up to 10 years in prison for providing gender-affirming care to individuals under 18.
At least 24 states have adopted similar bans on gender-affirming care for minors, with 20 states currently enforcing them. The recent ruling marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has addressed this issue, opting not to rule on the ban's constitutionality but rather on the enforcement of the law while legal challenges proceed.
Rights groups in Idaho are working to inform families about the law's implications and provide support. Gender-affirming medical care is now illegal for minors in Idaho, prompting concerns about access to care, especially for lower-income families.
Advocates fear that families may resort to altering medication doses or face challenges in seeking care out of state. The broader issue of bans on gender-affirming care for minors may resurface in the U.S. Supreme Court in the future.
Gender-affirming care for youth is endorsed by major medical organizations, although concerns about long-term effects persist. Medical professionals emphasize the positive impact of gender-affirming therapy on mental health outcomes for transgender individuals.
Despite the legal challenges, community support and advocacy efforts offer a glimmer of hope for transgender youth and their families. Legal proceedings are ongoing, with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals expected to address the lawsuit challenging the law this summer.
