Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
International Business Times UK
International Business Times UK
World
Seneca Cabrera

This Unusual Security Measure Was Put Up During Charlie Kirk Funeral: Was There Evidence Of A Threat Against Donald Trump?

Donald Trump at Charlie Kirk's funeral behind a bulletproof glass. (Credit: @libsoftiktok/X)

More than 100,000 people attended the memorial service for US political activist Charlie Kirk in Glendale, Arizona, where organisers introduced heightened precautions, including bulletproof glass at the podiums used by US President Donald Trump and other high-profile speakers.

The funeral was designated a Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) Level 1, the highest US security status short of a presidential inauguration. The scale of the memorial and the presence of prominent figures prompted questions about whether there was specific intelligence of a threat against Trump or whether the measures reflected standard protocol.

Security Measures at the Memorial

One of the most visible precautions was the bulletproof glass surrounding the podium, noted by attendees and viewers during speeches. Tyla reported that the transparent barriers drew particular attention as Trump spoke.

Other measures included a no-bag policy, checkpoints with magnetometer screening and a substantial deployment of federal and local agencies. Media reports said the Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and local police were all involved.

The stadium perimeter was reinforced with fencing and barricades, while state troopers and plainclothes officers were deployed. Both aerial and ground surveillance were used throughout the event, according to Fox News.

Reports of Potential Threats

Officials confirmed that agencies were monitoring several threats in the run-up to the funeral, although their credibility was uncertain. ABC News reported that a memo circulated among federal and local authorities, including the Secret Service, warned the memorial could attract politically motivated violence due to its size and media attention.

One incident heightened concerns further. WCIV reported that an armed man, identified as Joshua Runkles, was arrested inside restricted areas before the service. He was carrying weapons and posed as a law enforcement officer. Although he claimed to be conducting a security sweep for an unnamed VIP, the arrest underscored the tense atmosphere.

No Confirmed Plot

Despite these incidents, there is no public evidence of a specific plot against Trump. Officials described the threats as 'of unknown credibility', meaning they were general and unverified.

It also remains unclear whether Runkles intended to target Trump or if his actions were unrelated. Turning Point USA, the conservative group linked to Kirk, denied any association between Runkles and its formal security team.

Sources suggested the use of bulletproof glass was a precautionary step reflecting the size and profile of the gathering, rather than evidence of direct intelligence about an attack on Trump.

Why Security Was Escalated

The SEAR Level-1 designation allowed federal, state and local agencies to coordinate extensively on screening, surveillance and crowd management. The Washington Post noted that this level of security is usually reserved for events of significant national importance.

Officials pointed to the political climate, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and an increase in threats against public figures across several US states as reasons to take no risks. Analysts noted that large conservative events are being treated with particular caution in the current environment.

Precautions Viewed As Necessary

The visible use of bulletproof glass was one of several measures that reflected the heightened concern. While no confirmed threat against Trump has been identified, security experts told reporters the precautions were prudent given the circumstances.

For attendees, the protective panels were a reminder of both the risks surrounding high-profile political events and the federal government's effort to prevent disruption. The measures may have been unusual, but in the view of law enforcement officials, they were necessary.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.