Words to note, from Judge Amy Berman Jackson today, in Egolf v. Georgetown University:
MINUTE ORDER. Apparently, the parties either have not read, or they have read and do not intend to be mindful of, the Court's previous comments about unnecessarily contentious pleadings that waste the Court's time and resources. See Jan. 12, 2026 Order 32. Defendant Georgetown University's motion to strike 36 plaintiff's reply brief is DENIED, and plaintiff's motion for a short extension of time to file a reply which has already been docketed 35 is GRANTED. The parties should take note that with the reply, the motion to dismiss has been fully briefed, and it is under advisement. Nothing further is needed. And once plaintiff files a timely reply, if any, to the opposition 37 to his motion for reconsideration 34, there will be nothing else to be filed with respect to that or any other matter. No sur-replies will be permitted. SO ORDERED.
And from the cited Order at ECF No. 32:
Finally, given the nature, number, and tone of the pleadings to date, the Court finds it necessary to advise the parties as follows: 1) this case is going to proceed in an orderly manner; 2) pleadings informing the Court that other pleadings will be filed in the future are entirely unnecessary; and 3) caustic pleadings that include personal attacks on other parties or their counsel tend to obscure, rather than advance, legitimate factual and legal arguments, and they should be avoided.
The post "The Parties Either Have Not Read, or They Have Read and Do Not Intend to Be Mindful of …" appeared first on Reason.com.
