Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Telegraph
The Telegraph
National
Jack Hardy

Shamima Begum knew what she was doing when she joined IS, MI5 tells court

Shamima Begum pictured in Al Roj Camp in March 2021 - Sam Tarling for The Telegraph
Shamima Begum pictured in Al Roj Camp in March 2021 - Sam Tarling for The Telegraph

Shamima Begum “knew what she was doing” when she travelled to join Islamic State (IS) in Syria, a senior MI5 officer told her citizenship appeal on Monday.

The 23-year-old was said by her lawyers to have been “cynically recruited and groomed” when she was 15, before being trafficked for sexual exploitation at the hands of the terror group in 2015. 

Ms Begum is now mounting a fresh attempt to have her British citizenship restored after Sajid Javid, the then home secretary, revoked it when she was found in a refugee camp in 2019.

The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) is being asked to declare the decision unlawful on grounds including that Ms Begum was a trafficking victim and that she did not pose a national security threat. 

An MI5 officer who led a team investigating terrorist activity in Syria and Iraq in 2019 told the hearing it was “inconceivable” that Ms Begum “would not know what [IS] was doing as a terrorist organisation at this time”.

Asked by Ms Begum’s lawyer, Dan Squires KC, whether the Security Service had considered whether she was a victim of trafficking, he replied: “We consider whether someone is a threat - it is important to note that victims can very much be threats even if someone is a victim of trafficking.”

‘She knew what she was doing’

The officer, who spoke from behind a curtain and was referred to as Witness E, told the appeal it was “worth remembering” the crimes IS had committed by the time Ms Begum left for Syria. 

He listed atrocities including “the second deadliest terror attack in history” when 1,700 cadets were slaughtered in Iraq in June 2014, the genocide of Yazidis in the Iraqi district of Sinjar and the beheading of journalists including James Foley, Alan Henning and David Haines. 

He said: “In my mind and that of colleagues, it is not conceivable that even a 15-year-old - that 15-year-old having been predicted As and A*s, an intelligent, articulate and presumably critically thinking individual - would not know what [IS] was about.

“In some respects, I do believe she knew what she was doing and had agency in doing so.”

Shamima Begum - Sam Tarling
Shamima Begum - Sam Tarling

At the start of the hearing, Samantha Knights KC for Ms Begum, said the case concerned a British girl who, with her friends, had been “influenced and affected…by a determined and effective [IS] propaganda machine”. 

She was then “provided in marriage to an Isis fighter” and now continues to be held in “indefinite detention by a non-state actor seeking to prevent all access to her by lawyers”.

‘An exile for life’

Ms Begum remains at the al-Roj camp in northern Syria, which is run by the Syrian Democratic Forces. She has lost three children since travelling to the warzone.

Ms Knights continued: “It goes without saying that the deprivation of citizenship is an extreme measure.

“In Ms Begum’s case, it is effectively an exile for life, it had and continues to have the most profound impact.”

Ms Knights told the hearing that Ms Begum was smuggled over the border into Syria by a Canadian IS “agent”. 

It has previously been reported that a spy embedded in Islamic State working for the Canadian intelligence service was involved in taking Ms Begum into the country.

In separate written arguments submitted by Mr Squires, he said Ms Begum “was following a well-known pattern by which IS cynically recruited and groomed female children, as young as 14, so that they could be offered as ‘wives’ to adult men”. 

Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said in his own written submissions that the Security Services “continue to assess that Ms Begum poses a risk to national security”.

“This is a case about national security,” he said, adding: “This is not a case about trafficking.”

The case will continue being heard for the rest of the week. 

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.