Post-midnight vote fails to bolster powers in Sarah Everard inquiry

By Nick Lester, Chief Lords Reporter & David Flett

The Government has seen off a bid to bolster the powers of an independent inquiry into Sarah Everard’s murder.

The House of Lords rejected by 90 votes to 33 – a majority of 57 – a move to convert the current investigation into a statutory inquiry, where witnesses can be compelled to give evidence, if needed.

However, there was controversy with the debate on the issue being held so late on Monday and the eventual division coming well after midnight, reflected in the comparatively low turnout.

An attempt to adjourn the amendment to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill to another day had been defeated earlier.

It came as Home Secretary Priti Patel published the terms of reference for the first phase of the inquiry led by Dame Elish Angiolini QC, which will consider the “systemic failures” that allowed Ms Everard’s killer to be employed as a police officer.

Wayne Couzens is now serving a whole-life order in prison, meaning he will never be released.

The findings from the first part of the inquiry will inform the second – which will look at “broader issues” arising for policing and the protection of women.

The Home Secretary has already said the inquiry will proceed on a non-statutory basis in a bid to give Ms Everard’s family “closure as quickly as possible”.

However, Ms Patel has not ruled out putting the inquiry on to a statutory footing if necessary.

But Labour former shadow attorney general Baroness Chakrabarti pressed the Government to go further with a “full-blown” statutory inquiry now.

Home Secretary Priti Patel has said the inquiry will proceed on a non-statutory basis, without witnesses being compelled to give evidence, in a bid to give Sarah Everard’s family “closure as quickly as possible” (PA Wire/PA Images)

She was deeply critical of the debate on the amendment being held so late in the evening.

Lady Chakrabarti said: “Without powers to compel cooperation we will not get the kind of inquiry that is required.”

Independent crossbencher and prominent QC Lord Carlile of Berriew, who previously served as independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said: “We know because it has been proved in other cases… the police will sometimes strain every sinew to avoid being held fully accountable.”

He argued it was “outrageous” to be debating such an important issue so late at night and felt the chamber’s procedure had been “abused”.

Former victims’ commissioner Baroness Newlove said: “We are talking about a human life that was horrifically and brutally taken.”

Former Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens is serving a whole-life order in prison, meaning he will never be released, having been found guilty of murdering Sarah Everard (PA Media)

The Tory peer, whose husband Garry was killed outside his home after confronting vandals in 2007, said: “We must have a statutory inquiry for the soul of Sarah Everard and, indeed, for the sake of humanity. If we do not, this will be a shameful decision that we will always regret having made.”

Supporting the call for a statutory inquiry was Baroness O’Loan, whose independent panel into the 1987 unsolved murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan last year accused the Metropolitan Police of institutional corruption and a “lack of candour”.

The crossbencher said: “I do not believe that a non-statutory inquiry can act as effectively as one which is armed with the power to compel witnesses and the discovery of documentation.”

In the case of Ms Everard, she said: “The failure to deal with her murderer may have left him free to kill.”

Labour frontbencher Lord Coaker said: “Surely at the very least we could turn around and say we will use a statutory inquiry because that is the way the confidence of the public can be restored.”

Baroness Chakrabarti is pressing the Government to conduct a “full-blown” statutory inquiry now, where witnesses would be compelled to give evidence (PA Archive/PA Images)

Responding as it turned midnight, Home Office minister Baroness Williams of Trafford said it was “very frustrating” to be discussing such an important issue at such a late hour.

Moving to reassure peers, she said: “In coming to a decision on whether to convert the inquiry into a statutory inquiry… the Home Secretary will be strongly guided by the views of Dame Elish.”

As inquiry chair, her views “would be expected to hold considerable weight”, said the Tory frontbencher.

Lady Williams also pointed out there was now a duty of co-operation on police officers, which meant failure to do so could be a disciplinary matter “with dismissal being the ultimate sanction”.

For more stories from where you live, visit InYourArea.


What is inkl?

Important stories

See news based on value, not advertising potential. Get the latest news from around the world.

Trusted newsrooms

We bring you reliable news from the world’s most experienced journalists in the most trusted newsrooms.

Ad-free reading

Read without interruptions, distractions or intrusions of privacy.