Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer says he is "very keen" for the Government to tackle addictive social media features, following a landmark US trial.
In a potentially precedent-setting ruling on Wednesday in Los Angeles, a jury found Google, the owner of YouTube, and Meta, which operates Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, built platforms to hook young users without regard for their wellbeing.
The lawsuit, brought after a 20-year-old woman argued a childhood addiction to social media had exacerbated her mental health issues, could influence thousands of similar cases accusing social media firms of causing harm.
Sir Keir was asked if he trial pointed to a shift in public mood with an expectation that social media platforms would be more aggressively regulated.
He said: “I think it does, and obviously we’ll study that ruling very carefully, but I’m absolutely clear that we need to go further.
“The status quo isn’t good enough. We need to do more to protect children. That’s why we’re consulting about issues such as banning social media for under-16s.
“I’m very keen that we do more on addictive features within social media.”
The LA jury recommended that the plaintiff be awarded $6 million (£4.4 million) in damages.
Both Meta and Google disagreed with the verdict and said they were planning to appeal.
The Government is currently weighing up whether to implement a blanket ban on social media for under-16s, following a similar prohibition in Australia.
Ministers are currently consulting on the plan, while hundreds of teenagers are taking part in a trial of social media bans, time limits and curfews.
Peers supported a social media ban for under-16s for the second time on Wednesday.
Lord Nash, who proposed the age limit as part of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, said “techies” have taken a “cavalier approach” to content damaging to children.
Speaking in Helsinki, Finland, before a summit with national leaders from the Joint Expeditionary Force, Sir Keir added: “We’ve already taken the powers so that when we get to the end of the consultation, we don’t have to wait years to implement this.
“But I want to be really clear, it’s not if things are going to change, things are going to change. The question is, how much and what are we going to do?”
Earlier in March, MPs voted against an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, that had been backed by peers, that would have introduced a social media ban for under-16s.
Snapchat and TikTok were also named defendants in the US lawsuit, but each settled before the trial started.
A Meta spokesperson said “teen mental health is profoundly complex and cannot be linked to a single app” while Google said the verdict misunderstood YouTube “which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site”.
The California decision came a day after a New Mexico jury found Meta liable under state consumer protection law for misleading the public about the safety of its platforms and failing to protect children.
‘Far-fetched’ to suggest McSweeney phone theft linked to Mandelson files – PM
West facing ‘war on two fronts’, Starmer warns at defence summit
‘Far-fetched’ to suggest McSweeney phone theft linked to Mandelson files, says PM
Reeves ‘waiting until autumn’ for major energy bill support package
Why was Peter Mandelson arrested?
Streeting tells voters to give Starmer a chance and says he doesn’t want him ousted
