100s of titles, one news app for just $10 a month.
Dive Deeper:
There is no getting past the pandemic till we credibly count COVID-19 deaths
Indian statisticians and modellers are equal to any in the world. The government could easily set up a panel of…
The bitter dispute over India’s pandemic mortality
The ‘modelling’ that the Government is objecting to is largely simple data analysis and techniques for filling data gaps
Engage, not dismiss: On India’s response to WHO’s COVID-19 deaths report
Excess deaths measures are a robust way to estimate pandemic impact
When India challenged global HIV data and won
It has now countered WHO’s COVID death estimate, saying methodology used is incorrect
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
India insists WHO is wrong about Covid deaths. What do the numbers say?
The health and family welfare ministry issued a statement on May 5 disputing the World Health Organisation’s estimate of Covid…
WHO ignites row with 'preposterous' claim on India’s Covid tally
The World Health Organization (WHO) has put India’s excess Covid deaths 10 times higher than its official tally. Delhi rejected…
Get all your news in one place
Latest Comment news:
‘Savings’ from Australia’s public service efficiency dividend don’t add up – we should scrap it
The cumulative effect of unplanned cuts is to hollow out the core capacities of government
Read news from The Economist, FT, Bloomberg and more, with one subscription
Learn More
Michael Pascoe: Housing crisis? Look over there – a puppy!
Neither of the parties that will form government next week wants to confront the nation’s immediate need or offer large-scale…
The San Antonio Border Security Expo Is Decadent and Depraved
Robot dogs, cocktails, a shooting competition, and more taxpayer money than you can shake a drone at.
Why Background Checks Do Not Stymie Mass Shooters
The vast majority do not have disqualifying records, and "universal" requirements are easily evaded.
As Fox News legitimises race-hate theories, US lawmaker pleads for Murdochs to act
The recent mass shooting in Buffalo is an example of how the Fox News ‘war on woke’ empowers the far…
From analysis to good news, read the world’s best news in one place
Costings farce: charter of budget honesty is a relic without point
Why should oppositions bother to submit their policies for costing when the whole game is rigged against them?
The Mark McGowan factor: can the emperor of WA turn the election for Labor?
The WA premier has swept all before him in the past two years, but has he got enough star power…

Pandemic life and death: WHO’s estimate is it anyway?

Photo: HT

Broadly speaking, the WHO estimates the expected mortality (monthly) for 2020 and 2021 based on historical data, compares it to actual all-cause mortality (ACM) for 2020-2021 and interprets the difference as excess mortality due to covid. This is fine in theory, except for the fact that for India, the WHO does not have monthly ACM data for 2020-2021. To get around this “data gap", the WHO “estimates" monthly ACM for India.

Thus, the first point to note is that WHO estimates of excess deaths are themselves based on estimates and not observed data. Moreover, the WHO uses different models for estimating ACM for different countries. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, which the WHO does not provide, this renders a cross-country comparison of ACM and by extension excess deaths completely uninformative.

The second point to note is that the WHO uses data from 17 states to estimate national ACM for India. However, the source of this data remains shrouded in mystery. The WHO does not disclose which states are part of the sample. An Indian government press release has stated that this data is unverified. The WHO admits that the data may not be regarded as statistics “officially produced by India"; it also admits that besides official statistics, it also uses data provided by “journalists who obtained death registration information through Right To Information requests." From a statistical perspective, this is problematic because, as the WHO admits, different sources process and record mortality data differently. This means that splicing data from different sources can lead to systematic biases in the sample.

Thus, it is important to note that the 4.7 million number is an estimate which itself is based on estimates which are based on data that is unverified.

The third problematic aspect of the WHO’s estimation exercise is the statistical methodology it uses to estimate ACM for India from state-level data. The methodology it used is based on Karlinsky (2022), but much more complex. This is because Karlinsky uses one province (Cordoba) to estimate national ACM for Argentina, while the WHO uses 17 Indian states to estimate the national ACM for India. This is compounded by the fact that the number of states for which data is available varies by the month. Not only does the WHO not disclose which states are present in its sample, it does not say which monthly observations have been taken.

Thus, in essence, the WHO’s estimate based on estimates was drawn from unverified data obtained using a methodology that makes an assumption for India whose validity is suspect, at the very least.

Delving deeper into the methodology yields even more disturbing issues of implementation. The WHO accepts that the accuracy of its statistical methodology depends on two critical assumptions. First, that the distribution of the pandemic over time is similar for the states in its sample and the country as a whole. Second, the states’ share of total deaths in the country is stable both historically and throughout the pandemic.

While Karlinsky painstakingly documents this in his study, the WHO provides no evidence that these assumptions hold for the data it uses for India. Unlike Karlinsky, the WHO does not even present a rudimentary graph showing that the states in the sample went through peaks and troughs of the pandemic at the same time as the entire country. This is critical. Given the geographical spread of India and given that the spatial and temporal distribution of the pandemic varied quite widely across Indian states, using state- level data that does not mirror the pandemic’s national spread could inflate ACM estimates.

What is even more surprising is that the WHO claims to have validated this model in a simulation —for which it provides no details—but did not do it empirically, even though it is simpler and easier to validate it empirically. One, it could have implemented this model on countries for which both sub-national and national data is available and verified if the model-implied national ACM matches the actual observed ACM. Two, the WHO could have implemented the model on pre-pandemic sub-national and national data from India and verified if the model- implied ACM matches the reported pre-pandemic ACM for India.

This study does not constitute an isolated case of statistical adventurism. It is part of a sequence of sordid events, including the WHO’s intransigence over Covaxin, slovenly investigation of the origins of covid-19, its consistent undermining of data from the Indian government, an endless procession of ‘Indian origin’ ‘scientists’ on television flogging their ‘scientism’ with inaccurate forecasts, and lastly, ravenous hordes of ‘independent’ journalists scouring crematoriums and burial grounds with cameras and drones, ruthlessly trampling on the grief of shattered families in search of those elusive dead bodies that could prove massive undercounting of the dead in India.

These are the authors’ personal views.

V. Anantha Nageswaran & Diva Jain  are, respectively, chief economic advisor to the Government of India, and director at Arrjavv.

What is inkl?
The world’s most important news, from 100+ trusted global sources, in one place.
Morning Edition
Your daily
news overview

Morning Edition ensures you start your day well informed.

No paywalls, no clickbait, no ads
Enjoy beautiful reading

Content is only half the story. The world's best news experience is free from distraction: ad-free, clickbait-free, and beautifully designed.

Expert Curation
The news you need to know

Stories are ranked by proprietary algorithms based on importance and curated by real news journalists to ensure that you receive the most important stories as they break.

Dive Deeper:
There is no getting past the pandemic till we credibly count COVID-19 deaths
Indian statisticians and modellers are equal to any in the world. The government could easily set up a panel of…
The bitter dispute over India’s pandemic mortality
The ‘modelling’ that the Government is objecting to is largely simple data analysis and techniques for filling data gaps
Engage, not dismiss: On India’s response to WHO’s COVID-19 deaths report
Excess deaths measures are a robust way to estimate pandemic impact
When India challenged global HIV data and won
It has now countered WHO’s COVID death estimate, saying methodology used is incorrect
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
India insists WHO is wrong about Covid deaths. What do the numbers say?
The health and family welfare ministry issued a statement on May 5 disputing the World Health Organisation’s estimate of Covid…
WHO ignites row with 'preposterous' claim on India’s Covid tally
The World Health Organization (WHO) has put India’s excess Covid deaths 10 times higher than its official tally. Delhi rejected…
Get all your news in one place