100s of titles, one news app for just $10 a month.
Dive Deeper:
Court: California’s under-21 gun restrictions unconstitutional
“America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” Judge…
California's under-21 gun sales ban is unconstitutional, court says
A panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Wednesday the law violates the right to…
Court: California's under-21 gun sales ban unconstitutional
A federal appeals court has ruled that California's ban on the sale of semiautomatic weapons to adults under age 21…
US appeals court rules California ban on gun sales to people under 21 is unconstitutional
A federal appeals court Wednesday ruled that a California ban on the sale of semiautomatic firearms to adults under the…
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
Plasma, prisons, and political parties
California ban on selling semi-automatic guns to young adults overturned
Los Angeles (AFP) - California's ban on the sale of semi-automatic weapons to adults under the age of 21 violates…
Get all your news in one place
Latest Politics news:
Grattan on Friday: Numbers fly as unedifying campaign draws towards its close
The text arrived on Thursday morning, from a woman who helps me with my horses. “And now I have to…
Read news from The Economist, FT, Bloomberg and more, with one subscription
Learn More
Michael Pascoe: Now Morrison fibs about immigration
Given the frequency of Scott Morrison telling lies, telling the AFR a fib about immigration levels just before an election…
Election a chance to reset discovery research funding: Science groups
Australian scientists are eagerly awaiting the result of Saturday’s election as a chance to reset Australia’s discovery research funding following…
Cost of living hits home at Shortland pre-poll
Lynda Williams and her mother Judy didn't mince words as they left the Belmont pre-poll booth.
Labor plans to cut $200m from Entrepreneurs’ Programme
Labor will cut just under $200 million from the Entrepreneurs' Programme - about 75 per cent of the program’s funding…
From analysis to good news, read the world’s best news in one place
The UK attempts to rewrite Northern Ireland Brexit protocol: key questions answered
The European Union has warned that it will “respond with all measures at its disposal” if the UK goes ahead…
Deputy PM in Hunter for $5.5 million pledge, refuses to talk 'transition'
The Deputy Prime Minister was in Muswellbrook on Thursday to announce $5.5 million in funding for amenities at Olympic Park…

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Restriction on Gun Purchases by 18-to-20-Year-Olds

By Eugene Volokh

From Judge Ryan Nelson's opinion this morning in Jones v. Bonta, joined by Judge Kenneth Lee and in part (only as to the upholding of the hunting license requirement) by District Judge Sidney Stein (S.D.N.Y.):

California has restricted the sale of most firearms to anyone under 21. Plaintiffs challenged the bans on long guns and semiautomatic centerfire rifles under the Second Amendment. The district court declined to issue a preliminary injunction.

We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to enjoin the requirement that young adults obtain a hunting license to purchase a long gun. But the district court erred in not enjoining an almost total ban on semiautomatic centerfire rifles. First, the Second Amendment protects the right of young adults to keep and bear arms, which includes the right to purchase them. The district court reasoned otherwise and held that the laws did not burden Second Amendment rights at all: that was legal error.

Second, the district court properly applied intermediate scrutiny to the long gun hunting license regulation and did not abuse its discretion in finding it likely to survive. But third, the district court erred by applying intermediate scrutiny, rather than strict scrutiny, to the semiautomatic centerfire rifle ban. And even under intermediate scrutiny, this ban likely violates the Second Amendment because it fails the "reasonable fit" test. Finally, the district court also abused its discretion in finding that Plaintiffs would not likely be irreparably harmed. We thus affirm the district court's denial of an injunction as to the long gun regulation, reverse its denial of an injunction as to the semiautomatic centerfire rifle ban, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judge Lee also wrote a separate concurrence, "to highlight how California's legal position has no logical stopping point and would ultimately erode fundamental rights enumerated in our Constitution":

California justifies its law by citing statistics showing that young adults constitute less than 5% of the population but represent more than 15% of homicide and manslaughter arrests. The state argues that intermediate scrutiny should apply and that it survives that test because the law is a "reasonable fit" for the state's important public safety goal.

But even assuming intermediate scrutiny applies, the state's assertion of a "reasonable fit" reduces that requirement to a malleable and meaningless limit on the government's power to restrict constitutional rights. As the majority opinion capably points out, only 0.25% of young adults commit violent crimes. So California limits the rights of 99.75% of young adults based on the bad acts of an incredibly small sliver of the young….

If we accept the state's argument, it redefines intermediate scrutiny as a rational basis review with a small sprinkle of skepticism in Second Amendment cases. And that would allow the government to trample over constitutional rights just by relying on anecdotal evidence and questionable statistics that loosely relate to a worthwhile government goal. If California can deny the Second Amendment right to young adults based on their group's disproportionate involvement in violent crimes, then the government can deny that right—as well as other rights—to other groups.

For example, California arguably has a more compelling case if it enacts a similar gun-control law that targets males of all ages instead of young adults. Statistics— and science—show that men almost exclusively commit violent crimes. Take mass shootings for instance. Men have been involved in 99% of all mass shootings in America since 1966, according to a database maintained by the Violence Project.2 California can thus theoretically claim that if men cannot own firearms, it will eliminate 99% of mass shootings.

Judge Stein dissented:

Neglecting consideration of either the disproportionate perpetration of violent crime by, or the relatively immature and variable cognitive development among, adults under age 21, the majority opinion fails to conduct a legal analysis that comports with the corpus of precedent within this Circuit and elsewhere. Not only in my view is it error for the majority to apply strict scrutiny to the semiautomatic rifle regulation, but its alternative holding that the regulation fails under intermediate scrutiny suffers from a faulty assessment of whether the regulation is a "reasonable fit" for California's public policy objectives….

[B]y its terms, the semiautomatic rifle regulation is not a ban on young adults' ability to obtain semiautomatic rifles. This is true even though it prohibits FFLs [Federal Firearms Licensees] from selling or transferring semiautomatic rifles to young adults…. The semiautomatic rifle regulation allows for family gifts and a variety of other modes of possession through acquisition or loan; for example, the regulation permits a parent to purchase a semiautomatic rifle and transfer it to their child under age 21 through gift….

[Moreover, a]s the majority acknowledges, young adults still have access to reasonable alternatives for self-defense in the home, including the shotgun and other forms of long gun. Moreover, the time-limited nature of the regulation and the various avenues it leaves open to young adult possession of semiautomatic centerfire rifles mitigate its severity….

There's much more (the opinions and supplementary materials put together amount to 100 pages), but this should give a flavor of the positions.

The post Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Restriction on Gun Purchases by 18-to-20-Year-Olds appeared first on Reason.com.

What is inkl?
The world’s most important news, from 100+ trusted global sources, in one place.
Morning Edition
Your daily
news overview

Morning Edition ensures you start your day well informed.

No paywalls, no clickbait, no ads
Enjoy beautiful reading

Content is only half the story. The world's best news experience is free from distraction: ad-free, clickbait-free, and beautifully designed.

Expert Curation
The news you need to know

Stories are ranked by proprietary algorithms based on importance and curated by real news journalists to ensure that you receive the most important stories as they break.

Dive Deeper:
Court: California’s under-21 gun restrictions unconstitutional
“America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” Judge…
California's under-21 gun sales ban is unconstitutional, court says
A panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Wednesday the law violates the right to…
Court: California's under-21 gun sales ban unconstitutional
A federal appeals court has ruled that California's ban on the sale of semiautomatic weapons to adults under age 21…
US appeals court rules California ban on gun sales to people under 21 is unconstitutional
A federal appeals court Wednesday ruled that a California ban on the sale of semiautomatic firearms to adults under the…
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
Plasma, prisons, and political parties
California ban on selling semi-automatic guns to young adults overturned
Los Angeles (AFP) - California's ban on the sale of semi-automatic weapons to adults under the age of 21 violates…
Get all your news in one place