Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - US
The Guardian - US
World
Joseph Gedeon in Washington

Lindsey Graham’s sister and fill-in senator says she’s ‘not that informed on national security’

a man and a woman stand at lecterns in a television studio
Senator Darline Graham and US representative Ralph Norman participate in a televised debate ahead of the Republican primary runoff in Newberry South Carolina on 18 August 2026. Photograph: Peter Zay/Anadolu via Getty Images

Asked whether Taiwan and the South China Sea threaten US national security, republican fill-in senator Darline Graham hesitated. “I’m just going to be honest here,” she told Tuesday night’s debate audience. “I’m – not that informed on national security, so – but I do support the military.”

Gasps, and boos, rolled through the opera house hosting the only debate before next week’s Republican runoff – a race to succeed her brother, Lindsey Graham, who was one of the Senate’s most committed rightwing foreign policy hawks before his sudden passing in July. She did not retreat.

“I’m not a polished politician up here,” she added. “National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military.”

Her opponent, the ultra-conservative representative Ralph Norman, who once advocated for martial law to keep Joe Biden from the presidency after his election win in 2020, needed no such disclaimer. He walked through Taiwan’s economic ties to the US and made the case that it was worth protecting from Chinese aggression.

Graham, endorsed by Donald Trump and leaning on her outsider credentials, recovered later in the evening, describing her family’s reliance on social security survivor benefits after her parents died, and accusing Norman of being unable to decide whether he wants to work in South Carolina or Washington, citing his gubernatorial loss just this year.

Norman, who backed his state’s former governor Nikki Haley over Trump in 2024, used the debate to distance himself from the president over the war with Iran, saying Trump “is going to have to tell the American people what it’s going to take” if the strait of Hormuz remains under the control of a country the administration has claimed to have decimated.

Since 1979, the US has stuck to what’s called “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan: refusing to say whether it would actually send troops if China invaded, on the theory that being vague keeps the peace. Trump has largely kept up that dodge, but with his own twist.

At his May summit with Xi Jinping in Beijing, he said he wasn’t looking to fight a war “9,500 miles” away and wanted “China to cool down”, and put a pending $14bn Taiwan arms package on hold, calling it a “very good negotiating chip”. Xi, meanwhile, told him mishandling the Taiwan issue could lead to “clashes and even conflicts”.

Last August, Trump said Xi had personally told him China wouldn’t invade Taiwan while he’s in office – a claim Beijing brushed off, reaffirming its commitment to “reunification”.

In South Carolina, early voting begins on Wednesday, ahead of the 25 August primary.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.