Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Fortune
Fortune
Azure Gilman, Brit Morse

How California is trying to regulate AI in the workplace through a ‘No Robo Bosses’ bill

Robot assistant and young businessman working at a computer (Credit: Valerii Apetroaiei/Getty Images)

Good Morning!

Congress has been kicking around the idea of a 10-year AI legislation moratorium for a while now, and almost included it in the Senate’s version of President Trump’s “big beautiful bill” tax and spending bill. But while that remains an idea on the national level, states are already making their own moves to write laws about AI in the workplace. 

Colorado was the first state to pass legislation around AI at work, focused on algorithmic fairness, annual impact assessments, and worker rights. And California joined the fray earlier this year when State Sen. Jerry McNerny introduced the “No Robo Bosses” Act

California’s bill would require human oversight when it comes to promoting, demoting, disciplining, or firing workers. It would also protect personal employee information like religion and health care history, and prevent employers from using AI to protect worker actions that would result in a negative outcome against them. 

“The act will be a first-of-its-kind as it places significant restrictions on the use of AI in the workplace,” Luana de Mello, assistant general counsel and HR consultant with Engage PEO, tells Fortune. “This will require businesses to take a closer look at their AI systems, including regular audits, and to ensure they are using these systems transparently and in compliance with state regulations.”

Although AI has been tantalizing for business owners with its promise of major productivity gains, the potential pitfalls are real. A recent survey found that around 60% of managers rely on AI to make choices about their direct reports. Of that group, managers are using the technology to determine raises (78%), promotions (77%), layoffs (66%), and even terminations (64%). 

“The purpose of these laws really is to provide transparency,” says Angelina Evans, an attorney at Seyfarth Shaw’s Los Angeles office. “And [protect] the people that might have their rights violated, and they’re not even aware of it.” 

You can read about the California bill and what it means for employers here

CHRO Daily will be taking a break tomorrow for the Independence Day holiday. We’ll be back in your inbox Monday, July 7.

Brit Morse
brit.morse@fortune.com

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.