Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Ilya Somin

C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case

(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)

Today, the Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson, the case addressing whether Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Co-blogger Josh Blackman and I discussed and debated the case for almost an hour on C-SPAN's Washington Journal program. As regular readers know, Josh believes the Court should rule Trump is not disqualified, while I think they should rule that he is.

The video is available here. If I can figure out a way to embed it in this post, I will do so. But so far, I have not been able to.

My amicus brief in the case, which argues that disqualification under Section 3 does not require a prior criminal conviction, is available here. I have previously written about other issues related to the Section 3 litigation, most extensively here and here.

Josh's amicus brief (written on behalf of Prof. Seth Barrett Tillman) is available here.

The post C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case appeared first on Reason.com.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.