A High Court judge has ruled that doctors can lawfully stop providing life support to brain-damaged schoolboy Archie Battersbee after reviewing evidence at a hearing.
Doctors treating the youngster, 12, who was declared brain dead after collapsing at his home, say that continued treatment is not in his best interests and should come to an end.
Devastated parents Hollie Dance and Paul Battersbee, both in court on July 15 with other members of the family, have fought the medical advice from Barts Health NHS Trust, stating that their son would want to fight to the end, The Mirror reports.
Another High Court judge had earlier concluded that Archie was dead, but Court of Appeal judges upheld a challenge to the decision by his mum and dad. On July 11, Mr Justice Hayden reviewed evidence at a hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London and has now returned his verdict on the sad case, ruling the boy's life support machine can be turned off.
He described what happened to Archie as a "tragedy of immeasurable dimensions". Justice Hayden added evidence that showed Archie had suffered a “significant injury” to "multiple areas" of his brain and had not “regained awareness at any time”.
He said: "Archie’s mother described him as a fighter and I have no doubt he was...but the fight, if it can properly be characterised as such, is no longer in Archie’s control.
“The damage to his brain has deprived him of any bodily autonomy. Eventually Archie’s organs will fail and ultimately his heart will stop.”
Tragic schoolboy Archie Batterbee suffered a "devastating" brain injury at home in Southend, Essex, on April 7.
His mother previously said he may have been taking part in the dangerous "blackout" social media craze, where people choke themselves until they pass out.
Archie's parents want his life support to continue in case he miraculously recovers.
Medics say life support should be removed from the 12-year-old, who has been in a coma for several weeks.
The Court of Appeal was earlier told Archie and his mother had a brief conversation one or two years ago where he said he would like to remain alive if he ever found himself in such a situation.
He is said to have told his mother: "I wouldn't care, I wouldn't feel anything."
Lawyers acting for the trust argued those words do not rule out the prospect switching off his life support was in his best interests.
Martin Westgate QC, representing the trust, said earlier that Archie is "unresponsive" and has no prospect of recovery.
Ian Wise QC, the family's lawyer, told the court the youngster would want a "natural" and not "choreographed" death.
He said in his closing submissions: "What you can be sure of is that he would not want to upset his mother and father and that their wishes would be considered to the utmost.
“He would have wanted their wishes to be respected.
"We can't have a casual consideration of his best interests without giving full force to the sanctity of life.
“This treatment is not futile as it does what it sets out to do."
Martin Westgate QC, representing the trust, said in his closing submissions that carrying out more medical procedures would be futile.
He told the court: "One aspect of dignity is not to carry out extensive procedures where they are futile and cannot infer possible benefit to the patient.
"There is no realistic prospect of recovery and his treatment is invasive, and will become more so as it continues. It is desperately sad but he is never going to get better.
"The parents want there to be a miracle. The suggestions they are making are ones that are desperately wishing for more time."
Don't miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond - Sign up to our daily newsletter here.
