Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Technology

AI doesn’t care about authors, but Meta should

Women selecting a book in a library
‘I buy the books I need to read, or borrow them from a proper library, so that the authors get their fair library payment and their intellectual property is respected.’ Photograph: Getty/iStockphoto

Andrew Vincent makes a good point in that, very often, artists are already expected to behave like artificial intelligence (Letters, 6 April). But of course creativity is not simply a matter of training on the work of others. Innovative artists make decisions towards low-probability outcomes; imitation, meanwhile, seeks high-probability outcomes.

As things stand, generative AI models are imitation engines – and they do not celebrate their sources, they conceal them. Writers carry forward ideas and techniques, yes, but an immeasurable part of human creativity comes from the certain knowledge that we will one day die. AI does not have that gift. For all it consumes, it does not choose what to remember or believe or feel. Authors are as much up in arms about the extreme-capitalist assumption that we’re simply machines, regurgitating content, as we are about the systemic theft of our work. Human authors also tend to worry about the difference between inspiration and plagiarism. AI has not yet been programmed to care, and no one’s holding their breath on that count.
Timothy X Atack
Bristol

• Andrew Vincent says creativity has always “trained” on the work of others. He is right. Reading widely helps my writing, and art influences art. But I’m not objecting to Meta using my work for AI training; I’m objecting to Meta having done so without permission or payment, for commercial gain and outside the scope of fair use. I buy the books I need to read, or borrow them from a proper library, so that the authors get their fair library payment and their intellectual property is respected. Meta has stolen far more books than any single author could read – around 7 million. Please let’s consider properly the long-term consequences of allowing big, wealthy tech to flout legal protections and steal intellectual property from artists.
Abie Longstaff
Chair of the Children’s Writers and Illustrators Group, Society of Authors

• Do you have a photograph you’d like to share with Guardian readers? If so, please click here to upload it. A selection will be published in our Readers’ best photographs galleries and in the print edition on Saturdays.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.