Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Digital Camera World
Digital Camera World
Mike Harris

A single photograph will always be more powerful than a video and I can prove it

BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA - JULY 13: Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump is rushed offstage by U.S. Secret Service agents after being grazed by a bullet during a rally on July 13, 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania. Butler County district attorney Richard Goldinger said the shooter is dead after injuring former U.S. President Donald Trump, killing one audience member and injuring another in the shooting. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images).

We live in a world where video consumption trumps all other forms of media. From short-form social media footage and attention-grabbing YouTube clips to the Netflix flavor of the month, it’s video, video, video. As a photographer that can feel a little disheartening, especially if your worth as a creative lives and dies by your Instagram, which has long transitioned from a photo-first to a video-first model.

I won’t deny that the photograph’s relevance has diminished. But much like the written word, it’s far from obsolete. That’s because the photograph has something that video could never have, and rather ironically, it’s the very thing that has made video so much more popular: A still image is a still image – it doesn't move.

Think of cultural icon like Marilyn Monroe and your mind will likely go straight to famous photographs first, despite her glittering film career (Image credit: Getty Images / Bettmann)

A moving image, then, stimulates the brain more, producing a more satisfying hit of dopamine. Pair that with rapid-fire short-form content and you’ve got an addictive loop that’ll have you ignoring the pins and needles and back pain while you ‘doomscroll’ on the toilet for 40 minutes. Has anyone ever done that while pouring through Bresson’s The Decisive Moment? Unlikely…

So how could moving imagery ever be at a disadvantage? Well, it moves, it’s fleeting. The creator has little control over the point at which the viewer engages or disengages with the work (they could miss the crux altogether). And while the viewer may be able to watch the video multiple times, pause it or rewind, it’s much harder to pour over the crux, the climax, the decisive moment.

A still image on the other hand affords both creator and viewer much more control. The former is precisely delivering the decisive moment to the viewer, short of walking away, they cannot avoid it. And the viewer is able to engage with the content more deeply. This has the potential to increase impact, remove ambiguity and encourage deeper analysis.

Some of the most pivotal moments of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries have been immortalized through the power of photography (Image credit: Getty Images / Mario Tama)

And the proof is in the pudding. When you think about defining moments in human history such as the moon landing or 9/11, as well as cultural icons like Marilyn Monroe and Bob Marley, you tend to think of photographs. Photography has become synonymous with pivotal moments and despite the rise and rise of video, I’d argue that imagery is still largely (not entirely) preferred today.

I recently watched Disney+ documentary Love+War, which is a film about Pulitzer Prize-winning conflict photographer, Lynsey Addario. When I think about the Ukraine war, I find it difficult to separate the many snippets of video that have been played over and over on the news and social media. But Lynsey’s harrowing photograph of four dead Ukrainian civilians, which was published on the front page of The New York Times, is etched in my mind.

The work of conflict photographers like Lynsey Addario is still a vital means of reporting facts (Image credit: Getty Images / Lynsey Addario)

The same can be said for the attempted assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Pennsylvania. Video footage was repeated on the news, ad nauseam, but interestingly, it’s the photograph by Evan Vucci of a bloodied Trump, fist aloft, surrounded by Secret Service agents and framed against the Star-Spangled Banner that has endured. Why? Because that was the decisive moment and Vucci's camera immortalized it in a way that the video footage simply cannot. You cannot help but remember it.

And that’s the power of a great photograph. It reaches out, grabs the viewer by the lapel and shakes them. There’s no waiting for the impact, the impact is instantaneous and it lasts as long as the viewer lets it. A video can provide more context, it can take the viewer on a longer, arguably more intricate, journey, but the photograph is the knockout blow.

I’m not suggesting that photography is superior to video, but I am making it clear that photography is in no way inferior. We need both forms of media. But in this ever-changing AI-infused world where people have become more cynical of imagery than ever, professional photographers must be protected at all costs. The photograph, the still image, the single frame is arguably more important now than it ever has been before.

You might also like...

Photographer who took iconic Trump assassination attempt photo opts to FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! AP White House ban. Of all the photography quotes, “f/8 and be there” is my favorite. Here’s why Weegee’s timeless phrase is more relevant than ever. And for industry updates, check out the latest camera news.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.