Mike Lindell, the MyPillow founder and Donald Trump ally who has been a leading voice in pushing conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election, must pay $5 million to a software forensics expert who debunked a series of false claims as part of a “Prove Mike Wrong” contest, an arbitration panel said Wednesday.
Lindell had issued the challenge at a “cybersymposium” in South Dakota in 2021, saying he had data that would support his claims that there was Chinese interference in the election and offering the seven-figure prize to anyone who could prove the data had no connection to the 2020 election.
And because the software expert, Robert Zeidman, successfully did so, the panel, which was composed of three members of the American Arbitration Association, ordered that Lindell would have to pay up.
Zeidman, 63, who is from Las Vegas, filed the arbitration claim against Lindell in November 2021 after the contest’s organizers rejected his findings. The claim was filed in Minnesota, Lindell’s home state.
The arbitrators ordered him to pay Zeidman within 30 days.
Lindell, who has spent millions of dollars on partisan reviews of voting data and efforts to bolster election skeptics across the country, vowed in an interview to challenge the panel’s ruling.
Zeidman, who described himself as a “well-known” pioneer in the field of software forensics, said that he used his connections in the Trump world to obtain an invitation to Lindell’s symposium.
When conference organizers gave Zeidman and other attendees data to dissect, he said that he expected it might take weeks to analyze. But once he started going through the files, he said he quickly concluded that the data was bogus. He presented his findings to Lindell’s representatives in a 15-page report.
Brian Glasser, a lawyer for Zeidman, cast doubt on whether Lindell would be able to successfully challenge the arbitration decision in court, saying the bar was particularly high. Lindell would have to prove “manifest injustice,” a legal term for an unduly harsh outcome, he said.
Glasser also noted that the contest rules set by Lindell prescribed binding arbitration in the event of a dispute.
Still, Lindell insisted, “It’s going to end up in court.”
View original article on nytimes.com
© 2023 THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
