U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is currently facing significant backlash for stating that being a U.S. citizen is a “privilege, not a right,” after two individuals had their citizenship revoked for lying on their applications. Per the International Business Times, her comments also sparked debates about constitutional rights.
During an interview with Fox News about the denaturalization decisions, Bondi said, “Being a citizen in our country is a privilege, not a right. And President Donald Trump is going to have everyone in this country who deserves to be here, who is a citizen.”
Following the interview, Bondi doubled down on her stance with a post on X, writing, “American citizenship is a sacred privilege — not a cheap status that can be obtained dishonestly.” She also added that “Today’s denaturalization actions reflect this Department of Justice’s ongoing efforts to strip citizenship from people who conceal crimes or defraud the American people during the immigration process.”
A privilege can be stripped from anyone
This perspective quickly drew fire from many who pointed out that U.S. citizenship is, in fact, a constitutional right. The very first sentence of the 14th Amendment clearly states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Framing rights as “privileges” is a big deal because it suggests they could be taken away at any time, defeating the idea of constitutional protections.
The reaction on X was particularly strong. One X post made a terrifying comparison, matching Bondi’s statements to the revocation of citizenship for Jewish people in Nazi Germany.
I feel like I’ve seen this movie before pic.twitter.com/mUTGxcfqy9
— GomJabbar (@gomjabbar88) March 27, 2026
These comments from Bondi arrive amidst broader efforts by the Trump administration to tighten immigration policies and redefine citizenship. On January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order titled Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship. This order directed federal agencies to stop recognizing citizenship for some children born on U.S. soil if neither parent is a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident.
The legality of this executive order is already set to be challenged. The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments, while lower courts have already blocked the policy, stating it conflicts with the 14th Amendment and federal law. It’s worth noting that denaturalization, while gaining attention now, has historically been a rare occurrence in the U.S., with roughly only 11 cases a year
https://x.com/HawaiiDelilah/status/2037590145994772964
This process has traditionally been treated as an extraordinary remedy, typically reserved for cases of fraud or concealment during the naturalization process, as seen in the case of one former Florida Mayor. However, between Bondi’s comments and the administration’s decision to put quotas on denaturalization, we are likely to see terrifying times ahead.
