Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Entertainment
Anya Ryan

Winner’s Curse review – Clive Anderson’s warmth can’t revive this dodo

A warm-hearted ringmaster … Clive Anderson as Hugo Leitski in Winner's Curse.
A warm-hearted ringmaster … Clive Anderson as Hugo Leitski in Winner's Curse. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/the Guardian

‘Thanks so much for coming,” announces Clive Anderson as Hugo Leitski at the start of Winner’s Curse. He’s accepting an award for his lifetime of work in negotiation. It might be an evening of celebration for Leitski, but for the audience, it is a party we’d rather have not got the invite to.

The premise is an interesting one. Leitski looks back at his career beginnings, where he is an assistant to one of the representatives from two fictional countries meeting to battle and negotiate over a strip of land. Written by the former diplomat Daniel Taub, who has negotiated peace treaties in the Middle East, in partnership with Dan Patterson, it should have the sense of something thunderous. But, crammed into a form that feels undeveloped and dry, the drama is unsalvageable.

Instead, we’re left with a play that moves, jarringly, back and forth. First, we’re in the modern day with Leitski making his acceptance speech and attempting to engage a largely unwilling audience. We’re taught the techniques of basic debate and haggling, and then, thrown into a history of how Leitski, too, learned these lessons. It’s sold as an interactive play. With our neighbours, we’re confusingly encouraged to thumb war, discuss and barter. A sort of kinetic learning, perhaps? All of it feels artificial.

Getting around the table … Michael Maloney (Anton Korsakov), Clive Anderson (Hugo Leitski), Greg Lockett (Tyler) and Barrie Rutter (General Volvisch Gromski) in Winner's Curse.
Getting around the table … Michael Maloney (Anton Korsakov), Clive Anderson (Hugo Leitski), Greg Lockett (Tyler) and Barrie Rutter (General Volvisch Gromski) in Winner's Curse. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/the Guardian

Clive Anderson is a chummy and warm-hearted ringmaster. His natural off-script quips add genuine zeal to the otherwise dreary dialogue. Arthur Conti is charming too, as the younger, more hapless Leitski. Dressed in a cricket jumper, he clings to his sleeves as he awkwardly fights to find his place around the negotiating table.

It’s a play that is supposed to mark the obstacles negotiators face when striving to make peace. But the point it’s arguing for is nothing novel. There’s hushed conversations, logistical arguing and questions raised about how much truth you should reveal – none of it, though, is unpredictable.

It’s a dragging few hours that leave you feeling blank. This could have been a worthwhile investigation into the secrets of how peace is decided. Right now, it’s a drooping, stale, attempt at an uncovering.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.