Alexander Cockburn argues that the New York Times, having played a key role in fomenting the 2003 invasion of Iraq, is now "waging an equally disingenuous campaign to escalate American troop levels in this doomed enterprise." Just as one reporter, Judy Miller, was responsible for the pro-invasion coverage, so one reporter, Michael Gordon, the Times'smilitary correspondent, is responsible for the escalation push, writes Cockburn. He claims Gordon is the mouthpiece for a military faction led by General David Petraeus, and makes out an argument that should give Times editors pause for thought. (Via Counter Punch)
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
One app.
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles. One news app.
Why New York Times is backing Iraq escalation
Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member?
Sign in here
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Our Picks