After Google got into hot water with its employees over working for the US Defence Department (it ended up calling time on the project) now it’s Microsoft’s turn over what it does as part of a contract with the country’s Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE).
More than 100 employees posted an open letter to the company’s internal message board on Tuesday, protesting the work and asking for it to be stopped.
It comes in the wake of the outrage sparked by the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance policy” that ICE is central to.
It refers all immigrants caught crossing the border without authorisation for criminal prosecution. One of the results is that more than 2,000 children have been separated from their parents.
“We believe that Microsoft must take an ethical stand, and put children and families above profits,” said the letter, which was addressed to the company’s chief executive, Satya Nadella.
His initial response, via a company wide email, was interestingly rather similar to that of Google’s initial response to the furore over its involvement with the Defence Department’s Project Mavern: Take a chill pill, guys. We don’t help with any of the bad stuff and we never would!
Mr Nadella said the contract only covers things like email, calendars, and messaging.
Really, that's a bit like saying that we help out with the email servers for Lex Luthor’s plumbing business. Lexcorp Loos might not have anything to do with securing world domination for the CEO, and killing Superman in the process, but it’s still part of an organisation for which that is the aim.
But then the plot thickened. A blog by Tom Keane, a general manager who works for the the Microsoft Azure Government team, emerged in which he talked about enabling ICE employees to utilise “deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification”. He added that the business was “proud to support this work with our mission-critical cloud”.
You do wonder if one of those error messages we’re all familiar with popped up in the PR department when that one came out.
Of course, the blogpost has now gone viral, and it has only added to the unhappiness about the work at Microsoft.
CEOs hate being pushed around by their staff. The problem is that in Silicon Valley, attracting super brains to your business, and keeping them happy, is arguably more important than either the identity, or the ego, of the CEO.
If I were a recruiter for Google, or Apple or Facebook, talking to an idealistic and top rated Stanford graduate hailing from outside the US, I might be inclined to say 'of course, we wouldn’t have anything to do with that sort of work for ICE' if I knew Microsoft was the competition.
Were I from Google, I’d be saying, 'look, when our people spoke about what we did for the Defence Department we listened. That’s the sort of company we are. Now come work for us. Have you seen our massage chairs? And we have a free canteen and roller hockey games too!'
Perhaps as important as this is the the fact that Microsoft is a global business. Doing the sort of work discussed in the blogpost, and expressing pride in it, for one of the world’s most toxic organisations could have toxic implications for its brand.
So if Microsoft is smart it’ll ice its work for ICE as soon as is practicably possible, even that means upsetting Donald Trump and his pals.
Most importantly, it would be the right thing to do. But it would also be sensible and pragmatic from a business standpoint.
