Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business
Peter Preston

Why British coverage of Charleston wasn’t racist

Indy front
The Independent devoted its front page to the Charleston massacre, which in other papers only made the foreign pages inside. Photograph: Liz Boulter

Nine people shot dead in church. “America’s Shame,” cries the Indy. Racism or terrorism? That’s one media debate. But there’s another – in Britain at least – as critics note some papers (the Telegraph and Times among them) didn’t exactly clear their front pages over Charleston. Because the victims were black? Because of some lurking racism?

Try a much simpler reason. American mass gun atrocities are two a penny. Even Obama can’t stop them. They come and they bloodily go. American society shrugs them off. The 24-hour cable news cycle in a faraway land moves on to the next set of gory pictures. Big news, remember, is something different. But Charleston is and was just the same.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.