Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics
Letters

Why a 'dummy vaccine' is no such thing

A pharmacist prepares a dose of the AstraZeneca/Oxford Covid-19 vaccine at a temporary vaccination centre in Birmingham.
A pharmacist prepares a dose of the AstraZeneca/Oxford Covid-19 vaccine at a temporary vaccination centre in Birmingham. Photograph: AFP/Getty

David Spiegelhalter has written many informative articles over the past few months. However, his recent piece (There’s no proof the Oxford vaccine causes blood clots. So why are people worried?, 15 March) suggests a misconception on his part.

He describes it as remarkable that 28% of volunteers receiving the dummy vaccine reported side effects. The “dummy vaccine” is, of course, not a dummy at all but a control vaccine consisting of a vaccine active against meningitis causing bacteria rather than the coronavirus. It would be more remarkable if an active vaccine did not cause some side effects.

I am a volunteer in the Oxford vaccine trial, and, having experienced local and systemic side effects on the first day after my first dose, thought to myself that I “must” have had the coronavirus vaccine. A quick internet search soon showed that the control vaccine has known side effects of a sore arm, feeling tired, headache etc, which is presumably why it was chosen rather than a saline “dummy”. So I was none the wiser as to which vaccine I had had, until more recently when I was unblinded and my original hunch was proved correct.
Dr David Coombs
Oxton, Wirral

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.