Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Mirror
Daily Mirror
Politics
Jason Beattie

Who won PMQs? Emily Thornberry ditches the jokes for a forensic questioning of the Government's Brexit plans

With Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn attending the funeral of Kyra McKee the duty of PMQs was left to their understudies.

Normally the exchanges between Emily Thornberry and David Lidington are an enjoyable knockabout between two MPs of contrasting styles.

Ms Thornberry plays the part of a bar-room barrister celebrating a decent court win while Lidington adopts the role of monkish lecturer having to deal with a troublesome student.

In acknowledgment of the murder of Lyra and the atrocities in Sri Lanka today’s questions were rightly more sober in tone.

The Shadow Foreign Secretary gently probed what the Government was doing to protect the peace in Northern Ireland and received, in turn, an answer which saw Lidington make all the correct noises without saying anything of any significance.

Ms Thornberry then tried to link the recent upsurge in violence in the province to the Irish Border question.

She cited a leaked Home Office report which suggested that the Government’s plan to use technology to resolve the Border issue was unworkable, untested and unfunded.

The answer, she patiently suggested, was for the Government to keep the UK in a customs union.

Lidington refused to be drawn down this track and, without any real conviction, argued that Mrs May’s withdrawal agreement remained the only plausible way of resolving this vexed issue.

At this point Ms Thornberry abandoned her tortuous personal battle between wanting to be a serious stateswoman and her natural instinct to play to the crowd.

Somehow she managed to lever into the conversation a reference to Donald Trump’s state visit which she branded a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money before adding it may be worth it if he ending up sitting between Greta Thunberg and David Attenborough at the official dinner.

Lidington then recalled that his opponent had previously said it was in the country’s interest to work with Mr Trump and suggested her opposition to the President's visit was down to her leadership ambitions.

This rather pathetic jibe was flicked away without any effort as Ms Thornberry noted the only leadership contest taking place at the moment was in the Conservative Party.

Her final question saw Ms Thornberry return to a more serious tone as she asked about the cross-party talks on Brexit.

Mr Lidington, having previously suggested the negotiations were struggling, now decided they could still succeed if both sides were prepared to compromise and act in the national interest.

This was his lamest response and perhaps indicated that privately he agreed with his opponent on the customs union.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.