Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reuters
Reuters
Health
Jonathan Stempel

WHO wins dismissal of lawsuit in New York over pandemic response

FILE PHOTO: A woman wearing a protective face mask sits, as the global outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues, with luggage at the Metro-North Railroad and Amtrak train station in New Rochelle, New York, U.S., November 20, 2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

A U.S. judge has dismissed a lawsuit by residents of a suburban New York City county who accused the World Health Organization of gross negligence in responding to the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel on Monday said the WHO was immune under its own 1948 constitution and the International Organization Immunities Act from the proposed class-action lawsuit by the seven Westchester County plaintiffs.

FILE PHOTO: Messages written on small bags with lights in them are pictured outside Northern Westchester Hospital during a ceremony to remember those who were lost to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the one-year anniversary of the hospital's first COVID-19 patient admission, and to honor the hospital's health care professionals in Mount Kisko, New York, U.S., March 11, 2021. REUTERS/Mike Segar/File Photo

The plaintiffs, including a New Rochelle doctor and six Mount Vernon residents who contracted COVID-19, sought damages for Westchester adults over the WHO's alleged downplaying of the coronavirus early in the outbreak, and failure to quickly declare a pandemic and coordinate a global response.

But the judge said the WHO's pandemic response involved policy judgments within its discretion, and rejected arguments that its alleged negligence voided its immunity.

Seibel said the complaint "makes only the general and vague assertion that the WHO negligently failed to provide effective leadership and implementation of its core global functions under (International Health Regulations)."

FILE PHOTO: The logo of the World Health Organization (WHO), is seen before a news conference in Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2020. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo

The plaintiffs also argued the pandemic "likely could have been prevented" had the WHO not been "complicit in the spread and normalization" of Chinese government "propaganda" after early COVID-19 cases were found in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The WHO's lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. China was not a defendant. Seibel is based in White Plains, the Westchester county seat.

Westchester, whose population is about 968,000, became an early U.S. hot spot after a lawyer who attended a New Rochelle synagogue was diagnosed with COVID-19 on March 2, 2020, nine days before the WHO declared a global pandemic.

The county has had more than 121,500 COVID-19 cases and 2,200 deaths. There have been more than 30 million cases and 550,000 deaths in the United States, and more than 131 million cases and 2.8 million deaths worldwide.

The case is Kling et al v World Health Organization, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-03124.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.