Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Technology
Letters

Who really pulls the strings at Huawei?

A surveillance camera is seen in front of Huawei factory
‘It beggars belief that the government does not understand the Communist party’s decisive role in Huawei,’ writes Jeffrey Henderson. Photograph: Tyrone Siu/Reuters

The government is right that Huawei is not owned by the Chinese regime, but it seems to have missed – or ignored – the fact that it is probably controlled by the Chinese Communist party (Conservatives will push next party leader to scrap Huawei’s ‘non-core’ 5G contract, 25 April). Huawei is technically majority-owned by its employee union. As with all legal trade unions in China, however, Huawei’s union will be controlled by the Communist party. Additionally, as with other large privately owned firms, Huawei has a party branch, currently headed by Zhou Daiqi. Although Mr Zhou is Huawei’s director of ethics and compliance, it is almost certainly in his role as party secretary that he serves as a member of Huawei’s executive committee.

As China is a Leninist state, it is the Communist party that ultimately controls all government agencies, state-owned companies and, probably, private companies where it has a formal presence. It seems highly likely that when it comes to strategic decisions, it is the party – via Mr Zhou – that controls Huawei. It beggars belief that the government does not understand the Communist party’s decisive role in Huawei. Consequently, we must ask why it’s planning to allow the company any role at all in Britain’s 5G network. Is it because Brexit Britain will be in desperate need of any investment, including that controlled by the Chinese Communist party? Or is there something else going on? If this were a Labour government, the rightwing media would be telling us that Jeremy Corbyn was in the pay of China. But Theresa May? Surely not.
Jeffrey Henderson
Professor emeritus of international development, University of Bristol

• The correct course (Ultimatum to ministers in Huawei leak investigation, 26 April) would be to suspend all five principal suspects until the investigation is completed. It’s hardly as if the government’s performance would suffer in consequence.
Robin Wendt
Chester

• Re the Huawei leak, did anyone in the room have a switched-off Huawei phone in their pocket?
Michael Peel
Axbridge, Somerset

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.