Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World
Letters

When science and politics are worlds apart

Graffiti depicting the badge of Superman and Superwoman, forming the logo of a face mask
‘The statement that the general wearing of masks has no part to play in ending the epidemic is false,’ writes Dr Louis B Quesnel. Photograph: Oli Scarff/AFP via Getty Images

David McCoy (Faith in coronavirus modelling is no substitute for sound political judgment, 10 April) says: “Epidemiological modelling has played a disproportionately influential role in shaping the UK’s strategy and plans … and none can avoid the fact that decision-making must also be informed by people with relevant expertise and experience, and by the facts on the ground.”

I taught bacteriology in Manchester Medical School for 35 years and the first practical classes started with these sentences: “With bacteria all things are possible, bacteria don’t read textbooks. What you objectively and accurately record is what they do. What you expected or wanted them to do are questions that may or may not be answered.”

So, too, with viruses. Instead of trying to make the viruses’ behaviour fit magic curves, we must change to fit the behaviour of the viruses, which is why personal protection is so vital and works. Look at the graphs, follow the science. The safety factor difference between highest spec FFP3/N95 and standard surgical mask (EN14683), except in high virus density situations such as intensive care units, is small (see Leung et al. Nature Medicine).

The statement that the general wearing of masks has no part to play in ending the epidemic is false. Prof McCoy’s piece should have been headlined “Modelling is no substitute for scientific acuity”. Politics works in a very different way from science.
Dr Louis B Quesnel
Salford, Greater Manchester

• Re Richard Horton’s article (Coronavirus is the greatest global science policy failure in a generation, 9 April), good drivers anticipate the road ahead, whereas drivers who have been drinking can only react to the stretch of road they see ahead. Dr Horton is right that we were poorly prepared in December because of a failure of science policy. As a public health trainer and planner, I am personally responsible for this failure – I knew there were holes in our planning, especially in training for emergencies (see my 2019 note in the BMJ).

If I live through the crisis, I dedicate myself to training the next generation with more foresight, imagination – and humility.
Woody Caan
Retired professor of public health, Duxford, Cambridgeshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.