
Technology has made investing more accessible than ever, and robo-advisors are at the forefront of this shift. These automated platforms promise to manage your portfolio with minimal effort, often at a lower cost than traditional financial advisors. But while they can simplify investing, there’s one crucial topic that many don’t address in detail — longevity risk. For women, who statistically live longer than men and often face unique financial challenges, ignoring this risk can mean running out of money in retirement. Understanding what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk can help you make smarter, more sustainable financial decisions.
1. Women Are More Likely to Outlive Their Savings
Longevity risk is the possibility of outliving your retirement funds, and for women, this risk is especially high. On average, women live about five years longer than men, which means retirement funds must stretch further. Robo-advisors often use generic life expectancy assumptions that don’t reflect this difference. If your plan is built on an average lifespan instead of a realistic estimate for women, you could run into trouble later in life. This is one of the most important parts of what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
2. Lower Lifetime Earnings Affect Retirement Income
Many women face a lifetime earnings gap due to factors like wage inequality and time taken off for caregiving. Lower earnings often translate into smaller Social Security benefits and less money contributed to retirement accounts. Robo-advisors may not fully factor in these income differences when building a portfolio or withdrawal plan. Without adjustments, you could be withdrawing too much too soon, increasing your longevity risk. This gap is another reason to pay attention to what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
3. Investment Strategies May Be Too Conservative
Because women often say they prefer less investment risk, robo-advisors may automatically assign more conservative portfolios. While lower volatility feels safer, it can also mean lower long-term returns. Over decades of retirement, slower growth can increase the chance of depleting your savings. A balanced approach that considers both risk tolerance and longevity risk is essential. This trade-off is a critical detail in what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
4. Healthcare Costs Are Often Underestimated
Living longer usually means facing higher healthcare and long-term care expenses. Women are more likely to need extended care in later years, which can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Many robo-advisors use average healthcare estimates that may fall short for women with longer lifespans. Planning for these higher costs early can help avoid financial stress in your eighties and nineties. Ignoring this reality is another example of what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
5. Withdrawal Rates May Not Adjust for Longevity
Robo-advisors often recommend a standard withdrawal rate, such as 4% per year, based on broad historical data. While this might work for some retirees, it may not be sustainable for women who need income for a longer period. A withdrawal rate that’s too high early on can quickly erode savings. Adjusting withdrawals based on market performance, health, and age can make funds last longer. This flexibility is rarely highlighted in what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
6. Inflation Can Hit Longer Retirements Harder
Inflation gradually reduces the purchasing power of your savings, and the longer you live, the more it compounds. A modest 3% annual inflation rate can significantly impact your expenses over a 30-year retirement. Robo-advisors often use standard inflation assumptions that may not reflect the real impact over an extended lifespan. Women especially need to account for this because of their greater longevity. Underestimating inflation’s effect is a major blind spot in what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
7. Personal Goals and Lifestyle Needs Are Often Overlooked
Robo-advisors rely on algorithms and questionnaires to make recommendations, but they can’t fully capture your unique goals. For example, you might want to travel more in early retirement or help children and grandchildren financially. These lifestyle choices can significantly affect your withdrawal needs over time. If not accounted for, they can increase your longevity risk. Overlooking such personal factors is another shortcoming in what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk.
Planning Beyond the Algorithm
Robo-advisors can be an excellent tool for managing investments, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution — especially for women facing a higher risk of outliving their savings. By understanding where automated advice may fall short, you can take proactive steps to fill the gaps, whether that’s adjusting assumptions, increasing contributions, or seeking supplemental guidance from a human advisor. Your financial future should be built on realistic expectations that reflect your personal circumstances, not just averages. When it comes to what robo-advisors don’t tell women about longevity risk, knowledge and action are your best protections.
Have you considered how longevity risk could impact your retirement plan? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Read More:
8 Silent Shifts in Pension Rules for Women Over 55
7 Reasons You’re More Prone to Anxiety in Your 40s (And How to Fix It)
The post What Robo-Advisors Don’t Tell Women About Longevity Risk appeared first on The Free Financial Advisor.