Cindy Crawford has condemned a viral photograph of her that was shared as an unretouched image from a photoshoot as “stolen and malicious”.
A leaked photograph from a 2013 Marie Claire photoshoot was shared thousands of times after ITV anchor Charlene White tweeted it, describing it as from a forthcoming Marie Claire spread that would feature “100 per cent non retouched photos”.
The photo, which revealed the 49-year-old's stomach, hips and thighs, was praised for improving women’s body confidence, with many praising it as beautiful and inspiring.
However, it was later claimed that the "non-retouched" image had actually been stolen and doctored.
Crawford finally addressed the picture during an interview with Elle Canada.
The supermodel criticised White for not verifying the photo’s authenticity before tweeting it out with the suggestion that it was a photo that had not yet been Photoshopped, therefore representing the way Crawford’s body really looked.
“Why would seeing a bad picture of me make other people feel good?," she asked. "I felt blindsided. I was very conflicted, to be honest. The story had run a year and a half before, and the picture of me in that outfit was from the bust up.
“I know my body, and I know it’s not perfect, but maybe I have a false body image; maybe I think I look better than I do. I think that most women are hard on themselves. We think we look worse than we do. So I assumed I fell into that category, even though that picture didn’t reflect what I saw when I looked in the mirror—even in the worst dressing-room lighting.”
Crawford then approached photographer John Russo, who she said was “very upset” by the photo being leaked and sent her across the actual unretouched image to prove the viral version had been manipulated “to make whatever was there worse”.
Russo released a statement after the picture went viral claiming the photograph was not an unretouched image of Crawford, telling ABC News it was a “fraudulent altered version" of his photograph.
Crawford refused to comment publicly on the image after it was released, a decision affected by the positive reaction it garnered from women across the globe.
“It was stolen and it was malicious,” said Crawford, “but there was so much positive reaction [to the image]. Sometimes, the images that women see in magazines make them feel inferior—even though the intention is never to make anyone feel less. So somehow seeing a picture of me was like seeing a chink in the armour.
“Whether it was real or not isn’t relevant, although it’s relevant to me. I don’t try to present myself as perfect. It put me in a tough spot: I couldn’t come out against it because I’m rejecting all these people who felt good about it, but I also didn’t embrace it because it wasn’t real—and even if it were real, I wouldn’t have wanted it out there. I felt really manipulated and conflicted, so I kept my mouth shut.”
The Independent has contacted White for comment.
