Tim Davie’s dramatic resignation as BBC director general, alongside the departure of BBC News chief Deborah Turness, has sparked fierce debate about the broadcaster’s future.
The Panorama controversy, intensified by Donald Trump’s threat of legal action, has left many Independent readers questioning whether the BBC’s public service model is still fit for purpose in 2025.
The corporation has now apologised to the US President, admitting it made an “error of judgment” in broadcasting a Panorama episode with an edited speech by the American leader – but refused his request for compensation.
Several readers have defended the BBC’s global role and the quality of its reporting, arguing its model ensures trustworthy journalism and a uniquely British cultural output.
Others warn that succumbing to external pressure – whether political, legal, or commercial – risks undermining press freedom.
Meanwhile, critics say the corporation is struggling to stay relevant, with its reputation dented by scandals ranging from Huw Edwards’ prosecution to Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury set.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer told MPs this week: “Let me be clear, I believe in a strong and independent BBC … In an age of disinformation, the argument for an impartial British news service is stronger than ever.”
So what should happen next? Should the BBC reaffirm its public service mission, modernising carefully to meet the needs of a changing audience – or seize the Panorama controversy as a catalyst for a radical overhaul?
We want to hear from you. Share your thoughts in the comments – we’ll feature the most compelling responses in the coming days.
