Following the recent debate, questions have arisen regarding the treatment of the candidates by the moderators. While one candidate was perceived to have received less fact-checking and interruptions, it was argued that this was due to the magnitude of falsehoods presented by the other candidate.
The debate highlighted contrasting styles, with one candidate focusing on substantial issues while the other seemed more inclined towards theatrics and self-defense. The moderators were commended for maintaining a structured debate that showcased the candidates' differences.
Regarding crowd sizes, opinions varied on the former president's ability to draw crowds compared to the current candidate. However, recent rally attendance and engagement were cited as indicators of shifting enthusiasm.
Concerns were raised about the current candidate's media engagement strategy, with some questioning the limited interviews. Nevertheless, recent interactions with the press indicate a willingness to communicate campaign messages more extensively.
On the topic of tax fairness, proposals were outlined to address loopholes benefiting corporations and the wealthy. Suggestions included raising corporate tax rates and implementing a billionaire minimum tax to ensure equitable contributions.
While specific figures for top tax rates were not explicitly provided, a comprehensive approach to tax reform was emphasized to promote fairness and address existing disparities in the tax system.
