Feb. 17--United Airlines mechanics voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to reject the company's contract offer and authorize a strike, a setback in efforts to repair labor relations as the airline awaits the return of its CEO.
Over 93 percent of the ballots cast opposed the contract Chicago-based United put forth in October that would cover 9,000 mechanics in the bargaining unit, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters said in a press release. More than 7,800 members voted, the union said.
"At a time when United Airlines is incredibly profitable, it is clear that mechanics deserve a better offer from the company," Jim Hoffa, Teamsters general president, said in a statement.
Oscar Munoz, the airline's president and CEO, who suffered a heart attack just six weeks after he took the helm of the company and who is recovering from a heart transplant, said in a statement that "although we are disappointed by this outcome, we are eager to get right back to the table."
Munoz, who is expected to return to work at the end of the first quarter, added, "I will personally meet with our labor leaders to make sure we reach an agreement that will work for our technicians."
The parties are expected to appear before the National Mediation Board for a status conference March 3 in Washington, D.C., according to United. Although the union's members authorized a strike, the Railway Labor Act that covers airline employees requires that they jump through several more hoops before a strike can legally take place.
Among the issues in dispute is a two-tier pay scale that would give new hires less pay, vacation and sick leave than veteran workers for 8 1/2 years, said Bob Fisher, airline division representative for the Teamsters and a former United mechanic. Though the starting wage varies, it would be "in the low $20s" per hour for new hires and it would take them more than eight years to get to the top tier of $46.15 per hour, Fisher said.
"The idea of implementing B-Scale wages for incoming mechanics is unacceptable," Capt. David Bourne, director of the Teamsters Airline Division, said in a statement. "There is no need to place the financial burden for this agreement on the backs of future mechanics."
