We are pausing the UK blog for now. You can head over to our global blog for all the updates on the coronavirus -
The funeral of Conservative politician Mohammad Asghar, the first ethnic minority Member of the Senedd (MS) elected in 2007, was held today.
Asghar died at the age of 74 last week.
The funeral cortege left Newport Central Mosque and made its way to Mr Asghar’s office in the city, where politicians and members of the public paid their respects.
Among those attending were Monmouth Conservative MS Nick Ramsay, Newport East Labour MS John Griffiths and Monmouthshire council Conservative leader Peter Fox.
Updated
Driving lessons and tests to resume in England from July 4
Transport secretary Grant Shapps has announced that driving lessons and tests will restart in England from 4 July.
Maxine Peake, the actor and Labour supporter, has issued a clarification of her interview which Rebecca Long-Bailey had retweeted.
I feel it’s important for me to clarify that, when talking to The Independent, I was inaccurate in my assumption of American Police training & its sources. I find racism & antisemitism abhorrent & I in no way wished, nor intended, to add fodder to any views of the contrary.
— Maxine Peake (@MPeakeOfficial) June 25, 2020
David Lammy, the shadow justice secretary, has accused Boris Johnson of misleading the Commons at Prime Minister’s Questions, when he claimed the government implemented 16 recommendations from his 2017 report into the treatment of ethnic minorities in the criminal justice system.
In a letter to the prime minister - seen by the BBC - Lammy urges the prime minister to correct what he calls “a catalogue of falsehoods” - and says only six of those 16 recommendations have been implemented.
His report, published in September 2017, contained 35 recommendations.
During Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Johnson said: “Sixteen of the Lammy recommendations have been implemented. A further 17 are in progress; two of them we are not progressing.”
Earlier this week, Justice Minister Alex Chalk answered a written parliamentary question saying 16 had been “completed”, 17 were still in progress and two were not being taken forward.
In his letter, Lammy says he presumes the prime minister was referring to the same 16 - but says of those, only six have actually been implemented.
He writes that if the government is serious about correcting injustices, “it needs to be honest about the actions it has taken”.
Updated
From Heather Stewart, the Guardian’s political editor, on Rebecca Long-Bailey’s sacking.
Hearing the Campaign Group are crafting a statement of solidarity with RLB - which Jeremy Corbyn is expected to support.
— Heather Stewart (@GuardianHeather) June 25, 2020
Updated
On Rebecca Long-Bailey’s sacking from the shadow cabinet, Dame Louise Ellman, former Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, told ITV Granada Reports: “I’m delighted to hear this.
“It does gives me confidence that Keir Starmer is a man of his word and does want to stamp out antisemitism.
“This is dismissing somebody who is very senior, somebody who indeed stood against him as leader of the Labour party a very short time ago.
“It’s a very encouraging sign.”
Ellman quit the party last October as she believed antisemitism had become mainstream under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn.
Updated
Councillors and an MSP have written to Police Scotland questioning the response of officers to recent protests in Glasgow city centre.
SNP councillor Ruairi Kelly raised concerns with chief superintendent Hazel Hendren claiming “fascist thugs were able to run wild in George Square” on Saturday.
The Glasgow City Council representative’s letter was sent days after an event aimed at “sending a positive anti-racist message from Glasgow’s George Square to the world on World Refugee Day”.
Kelly said peaceful protesters and members of the public were attacked on two separate occasions in the square.
He wrote: “These appeared to be planned attacks and a quick search of known social media accounts shows that groups such as the National Defence League had called people out onto the streets.
“Was there not sufficient advanced warning to keep these individuals separate from the public?”
Reaction from Richard Burgon MP to Rebecca Long-Bailey’s sacking.
Becky did a great job as Shadow Education Secretary standing with unions against Tory attempts to force schools to reopen.
— Richard Burgon MP (@RichardBurgon) June 25, 2020
She has an important role to play in Labour's future and I don't think she should've been sacked for sharing the Independent’s interview with Maxine Peake.
Evening summary
- The latest weekly test and trace figures published by the government have shown performance falling back on three key indicators. (See 12.12pm.)
- The £900,000 refurbishment of RAF Voyager - the plane used by the Royal Family and the prime minister - has been completed, the BBC reports.
Updated
Sir Keir Starmer has recorded a longish interview with the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg today. Here are some excerpts.
Three things Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer wants to see from the government on economic recovery:
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 25, 2020
- Infrastructure projects brought forward
- Extend the furlough scheme for sectors that need it
- Support for those who lose their jobshttps://t.co/dhAWRpVwHj pic.twitter.com/dUS6Nmc4Hg
Speaking to @BBCLauraK the Labour leader warned of up to three million job losses as a result of the coronavirus crisishttps://t.co/k38f2cIo61
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 25, 2020
"A good strong leader on top of his or her brief, would relish prime minister's questions," says Labour leader Keir Starmer
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 25, 2020
He says Boris Johnson is "complaining about criticism" in #PMQshttps://t.co/GePgIlfx35 pic.twitter.com/UHwucJVcTk
Long-Bailey's sacking: analysis and reaction from commentariat
Sir Keir Starmer has made a good start at Labour leader – an Ipsos Mori poll recently gave him the highest approval rating for an opposition leader since Tony Blair in the mid-1990s – but a common argument from commentators has been that, having run as a unity candidate in the leadership contest, he needed to do something to show the party had finally buried the electorally-toxic aspects of the Corbyn era. My colleague Polly Toynbee made this case in the Guardian just three days ago, and others have too. Now that moment has actually arrived.
In some respects the rights and wrongs of what actually happened are secondary – Starmer says sharing the article in the first place was unacceptable (see 4.16pm); Rebecca Long-Bailey says she was sacked because she would not accept the terms of the climbdown required (see 3.53pm) – because they will soon be forgotten. But what won’t be forgotten is that, after less then three months as leader, Starmer abruptly dispatched the most senior Corbynite left in his shadow cabinet. And he did so at a time when the prime minister was facing criticism, including from the Tory papers, for not being able to sack a minister who had become a liability.
It is too soon to be sure what will happen next (see Stephen Bush below), but so far no one has resigned in solidarity with Long-Bailey and the left may find its options for disruption are limited. Starmer does not look like someone at risk of losing his grip on his party.
The move will also allow him to appoint a new shadow education secretary, at a time when more or less the only line of attack the Conservatives have been able to run against Labour is the claim that the party has sided with the unions against parents wanting to see their children return to school soon. It wasn’t wholly true, but Long-Bailey is likely to be replaced by someone more attuned to the consumer interest than the producer interest in education.
This is what some other commentators are saying.
Stephen Bush in the New Statesman says Starmer has started “a major and significant fight with his party’s left flank”. Here’s an extract.
The Labour leader’s decision to sack Long-Bailey is a sign that he is serious about having a zero tolerance policy on anti-Semitism within the party – but it is also going to be the trigger for a major conflict within Labour, one which Starmer cannot be certain of winning. It’s not clear if other frontbench members of the Socialist Campaign Group, the main left-wing grouping in the parliamentary party, will opt to join Long-Bailey on the backbenches. The reaction of the party’s rank and file is, likewise, uncertain: and Starmer could yet find that his majority on the ruling national executive committee, and with it his ability to drive through changes to how the party is run, which are vital to dealing with anti-Semitism, is lost as a consequence.
Equally, of course, the row could end up with Starmer strengthened: benefiting from the clear signal he has sent about his priorities, and a further divided Labour left, with some on the frontbenches, some clustering around Long-Bailey, and others looking to leadership from Richard Burgon, who several Campaign Group MPs think did a better job of outlining Corbynite principles in the deputy race than Long-Bailey did in the main leadership contest. The outcome of Starmer’s decision today is highly uncertain.
From my colleague Rafael Behr
Sacking RLB was right in terms of zero tolerance on antisemitism, but in raw political terms it also reflects well on Starmer's judgement. He could see the future cost of letting it slide in terms of issuing a licence for worse and for brazenness with it.
— Rafael Behr (@rafaelbehr) June 25, 2020
From the Sunday Times’ Tim Shipman
The question mark over Keir Starmer is not competence but whether he can do politics. He has just:
— Tim Shipman (@ShippersUnbound) June 25, 2020
1) Shown he means business on antisemitism
2) Made Boris look indecisive
3) Offloaded a Corbynite
4) Helped the hard left Twittersphere reveal itself as ridiculous
Good day’s work
From Newsnight’s Lewis Goodall
Analysis
— Lewis Goodall (@lewis_goodall) June 25, 2020
1) Starmer ran, to some extent, as continuity left. From off that fell away. It's now gone.
2) No significant Corbynista figures remain in Shad Cab,
3) The PLP (and 2019 intake) more Corbyn types than before. Phalanx of left on backbenches. Will be centre of discontent
4) Left won't forget
— Lewis Goodall (@lewis_goodall) June 25, 2020
5) On plus side for Starmer, he looks strong, decisive to outside world. Contrast clear with Johnson and Jenrick and Corbyn era approach.
6) V strong signal on anti-Semitism.
7) He can replace Education (key brief atm) with someone to his liking.
8) We also musn't forget that the EHRC report is imminent. It will likely be damning about Labour's handling of the anti-Semitism issue. This act will help him frame the party's response under his leadership and to draw a line.
— Lewis Goodall (@lewis_goodall) June 25, 2020
From Matt Forde, presenter of the Political Party podcast
Keir Starmer draws a contrast not just with Jeremy Corbyn but with Boris Johnson. Corbyn and Johnson are part of the same political culture, promoting and standing by toxic individuals. Starmer is showing the way to a new, more decent era.
— Matt Forde (@mattforde) June 25, 2020
From my colleague Owen Jones
Sacking Rebecca Long-Bailey for sharing an interview in *the Independent* with one of Britain's most celebrated actors because of a sentence uttered by Maxine Peake which the Independent initially justified with a link to an Amnesty International report is an absurd overreaction
— Owen Jones says join a union🌹 (@OwenJones84) June 25, 2020
From the Mail on Sunday’s Dan Hodges
If I was Boris I'd be having a long hard think this afternoon. The Tories are going to have to come at Starmer with a lot more than a Union Jack tail-fin the abolition of DFID and 10 years for doing bad things to the Cenotaph.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) June 25, 2020
From the Tribune editor Ronan Burtenshaw
After weeks of undermining Rebecca Long-Bailey’s efforts to stand up for teachers and their unions, Starmer sacks her to protect the reputation of the Israeli occupation.
— Ronan Burtenshaw (@ronanburtenshaw) June 25, 2020
You would call him a coward - but a man who stands for nothing never has a need for courage.
From Tom Harris, a former Labour MP and now a Telegraph columnist
'Sacking Rebecca Long-Bailey for plugging Maxine Peake's incendiary views shows Keir Starmer is ready to do the right thing,' writes @MrTCHarris https://t.co/G2f9tJuGFM
— Telegraph Politics (@TelePolitics) June 25, 2020
Updated
From the Times’ Patrick Maguire
I'm told a delegation of left frontbenchers is trying to secure a meeting with Starmer to discuss RLB's sacking
— Patrick Maguire (@patrickkmaguire) June 25, 2020
Here is a clip of Sir Keir Starmer explaining why Rebecca Long-Bailey was sacked.
"I’ve made it my first priority to tackle anti-Semitism and rebuilding trust with the Jewish community is a number one priority for me,” says Keir Starmer as he sacks Rebecca Long-Bailey for sharing an article containing "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory"https://t.co/Whg4nWTels pic.twitter.com/C89Wud0Jre
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 25, 2020
These are from two of the MPs who left Labour when Jeremy Corbyn was leader, in part because of his record on antisemitism. They are now both, of course, ex-MPs.
From Mike Gapes
This is a good day for Labour. Still a long way to go, but congratulations to Keir Starmer for showing decisive leadership.
— Mike Gapes (@MikeGapes) June 25, 2020
From Joan Ryan
Good to see @Keir_Starmer keep his word re. tearing antisemitism out by its roots whether it’s shad cab, backbench or ordinary member. No favour no exceptions and no tolerance for antisemitism or any kind of racism.
— Joan Ryan (@joanryanEnfield) June 25, 2020
And this is from John Mann, who was also strongly critical of the party’s record on antisemitism when he was an MP and Corbyn was leader. Mann now sits as an independent peer in the House of Lords.
What a change. Leadership. Shocking and appalling slur. Old style conspiracy theory which is both divisive and fabricated. https://t.co/MImLJqsa7d
— John Mann (@LordJohnMann) June 25, 2020
Updated
Dame Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP who frequently accused Jeremy Corbyn of being too tolerant on antisemitism, has welcomed the sacking of Rebecca Long-Bailey.
This is what a change in culture looks like.
— Margaret Hodge (@margarethodge) June 25, 2020
This is what zero tolerance looks like.
This is what rebuilding trust with the Jewish community looks like. https://t.co/6QL5wS92GX
This is from the Commons all-party parliamentary group on antisemitism, and its co-chairs, Labour’s Catherine McKinnell and the Conservative Andrew Percy.
Statement in response to the sacking of Shadow Education Secretary, Rebecca Long-Bailey MP, from APPG Against Antisemitism co-chairs Catherine McKinnell MP and Andrew Percy MP pic.twitter.com/VcZTeyH1Y4
— APPG Antisemitism (@APPGAA) June 25, 2020
From the BBC’s Iain Watson
labour leadership sources say @RLong_Bailey ' was sacked because she would not remove her initial tweet and it was nonsense that @Keir_Starmer had been looking for an excuse to sack her.
— iain watson (@iainjwatson) June 25, 2020
Long-Bailey's sacking a 'reckless over-reaction', says Momentum founder Jon Lansman
These are from Jon Lansman, the founder of Momentum, the pro-Corbyn group in the Labour party, which backed Rebecca Long-Bailey for the leadership.
I retweeted this 5 hours ago without comment in a break in a Labour Party antisemitism panel - my 4th in the last month. In my view there is nothing in what Maxine Peake said that a Labour panel would view as antisemitic. https://t.co/u3eEoZO1qy
— Jon Lansman (@jonlansman) June 25, 2020
Rebecca is every bit as committed to ending antisemitism in the Labour Party as I am. Her sacking is a reckless over-reaction from someone who promised to end factionalism in the party and political interference in disciplinary matters. Keir has now made these tasks harder
— Jon Lansman (@jonlansman) June 25, 2020
Updated
The FT’s Jim Pickard says Rebecca Long-Bailey may have read a version of the Maxine Peake interview before it was amended by the Independent.
one problematic issue with the @RLong_Bailey sacking is that she may have read an earlier version of the Peake interview which (inaccurately) cited Amnesty International, a point that has since been the subject of this explanationhttps://t.co/f4eHVZKQpF pic.twitter.com/gIxCvvqo5s
— Jim Pickard (@PickardJE) June 25, 2020
A reader sent me a link to the original.
I'm surprised the Guardian political blog by @AndrewSparrow has not mentioned the @independent interview with Maxime Peak actually removed the line by Amnesty International. The original published version available here > https://t.co/vTtUbTHKKB pic.twitter.com/HRVPKmfDoN
— Jane Samuels (@Jane_Samuels) June 25, 2020
Starmer says Long-Bailey was sacked because her tweet undermined efforts to rebuild trust with Jewish community
Sir Keir Starmer said Rebecca Long-Bailey’s decision to share the Independent article undermined his attempts to rebuild relations with the Jewish community, speaking to political journalists in Scotland.
During a short online press conference on Thursday afternoon, arranged to coincide to a “town hall” hustings earlier with Scottish voters, Starmer was asked whether Long-Bailey had admitted she had made a mistake retweeting the Independent interview with Maxine Peak, and had stood down willingly.
Starmer said:
I’m not going into the ins and outs of the various conversations I may have had, interesting though they would be. I’m just very clear about my focus and that is rebuilding trust with the Jewish community. I do not consider sharing that article furthered the course of rebuilding trust with the Jewish community and that’s why I stood Rebecca Long-Bailey down.
He refused to comment when asked whether he believed his former education spokeswoman was antisemitic, quoting instead his previous statement.
I have asked her to step down because she shared that article; I have made it my number one priority to rebuild trust with the Jewish communities. In the interests of rebuilding that trust I have stood her down from the shadow cabinet.
Asked again whether he thought Long-Bailey was antisemitic, he said it was because the Peake interview contained antisemitic conspiracy theories:
I asked Rebecca Long-Bailey to step down from the shadow cabinet for sharing the article. I didn’t do that because she is antisemitic, I did it because she shared the article which has got, in my view, antisemitic conspiracy theories in it.
My primary focus is on rebuilding trust with the Jewish communities. I didn’t think sharing that article was in keeping with that primary objective.
Updated
Commenting on Rebecca Long-Bailey’s sacking, Jonathan Goldstein, chair of the Jewish Leadership Council, said:
Today we saw significant action from Sir Keir Starmer in ensuring there is zero tolerance for antisemitism within the Labour party. His actions show he understands the severity and harm that antisemitic conspiracies do to our politics. We welcome this decisive leadership and firm action.
John McDonnell says Long-Bailey shouldn't have been sacked
John McDonnell, shadow chancellor when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader, says Rebecca Long-Bailey should not have been sacked. He says it has always been accepted that criticising the activities of Israel is not antisemitism.
Long-Bailey used to work in McDonnell’s shadow Treasury team and he was a strong supporter of her candidature for the Labour leadership.
Throughout discussion of antisemitism it’s always been said criticism of practices of Israeli state is not antisemitic. I don’t believe therefore that this article is or @RLong_Bailey should’ve been sacked. I stand in solidarity with her https://t.co/rhxuKGfFEG
— John McDonnell MP (@johnmcdonnellMP) June 25, 2020
Updated
Robert Halfon, the Tory MP and a strong supporter of “blue collar conservatism” (ie, the belief that the party has make a strong appeal to the working class), thinks that by sacking Rebecca Long-Bailey, Sir Keir Starmer has shown he is “a force to be reckoned with”.
Proof that @Keir_Starmer, step by step is de-Corbynising the Labour Party - showing that he is a force to be reckoned with and that no @conservatives can afford to be complacent about his leadership or our strong parliamentary majority👇 https://t.co/Auk5yfjOQt
— Robert Halfon MP -Working Hard for Harlow- (@halfon4harlowMP) June 25, 2020
Updated
Long-Bailey says Starmer's office originally approved clarification tweet that intensified calls for her sacking
Rebecca Long-Bailey has posted a thread on Twitter giving her account of the events leading up to her sacking as shadow education secretary. Here are the main points.
- Long-Bailey claims Sir Keir Starmer’s office originally approved the tweet she issued clarifying her original endorsement of the Maxine Peak interview. This is significant because it was in response to that clarification tweet that the Board of Deputies of British Jews suggested she should be sacked.
- She suggests that Starmer’s office subsequently changed its mind, and demanded the withdrawal of the original tweet. She said she was not willing to do that without being allowed to issue a press statement explaining the clarification.
- She says Starmer refused to discuss the matter with her in person before she was dismissed.
- She says she intends to continuing supporting the Labour party under Starmer’s leadership.
Here are the tweets.
https://t.co/XyTPHR40Qd I retweeted an interview that my constituent and stalwart Labour Party supporter Maxine Peake gave to the Independent. Its main thrust was anger with the Conservative Government’s handling of the current emergency and a call for Labour Party unity.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
2.These are sentiments are shared by everyone in our movement and millions of people in our country. I learned that many people were concerned by references to international sharing of training and restraint techniques between police and security forces.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
https://t.co/83kCSyj9FG no way was my retweet an intention to endorse every part of that article.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
4.I wished to acknowledge these concerns and duly issued a clarification of my retweet, with the wording agreed in advance by the Labour Party Leader’s Office, but after posting I was subsequently instructed to take both this agreed clarification and my original retweet down.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
5.I could not do this in good conscience without the issuing of a press statement of clarification. I had asked to discuss these matters with Keir before agreeing what further action to take, but sadly he had already made his decision.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
6.I am proud of the policies we have developed within the party from our Green Industrial Revolution to a National Education Service and I will never stop working for the change our communities need to see.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
7.I am clear that I shall continue to support the Labour Party in Parliament under Keir Starmer’s leadership, to represent the people of Salford and Eccles and work towards a more equal, peaceful and sustainable world.
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
Updated
And here is the full statement from the Jewish Labour Movement.
Jewish Labour Movement statement in response to Rebecca Long-Bailey’s resignation.
— Jewish Labour Movement (@JewishLabour) June 25, 2020
The culture of an organisation is determined by the values of those who lead it.
We welcome Keir Starmer’s actions and hope that the Party, at every level, reflect and learn from this. pic.twitter.com/7M2SDjobEv
The Jewish Labour Movement has welcomed Rebecca Long-Bailey’s sacking, Sky’s Aubrey Allegretti reports.
Jewish Labour Movement says Rebecca Long-Bailey sacking "should be welcomed".
— Aubrey Allegretti (@breeallegretti) June 25, 2020
National chair @mikekatz: "We have consistently maintained that the pervasive culture of antisemitism, bullying and intimidation can only be tackled by strong and decisive leadership."
This is from Matt Zarb-Cousin, who worked as a media adviser first for Jeremy Corbyn when he was Labour leader and then for Rebecca Long-Bailey when she was running for leader (effectively as the candidate of the Corbynite left). Zarb-Cousin is referring to Sir Keir Starmer’s refusal earlier to call for Robert Jenrick to be sacked. (See 11.41am.)
Apparently we’re now more willing to sack our own front-benchers than call for the sacking of government front-benchers 🤷🏻♂️
— Matt Zarb-Cousin (@mattzarb) June 25, 2020
From the Sunday Times’ Gabriel Pogrund
One LOTO source notes that Long Bailey failed to condemn a member who blamed the "Israeli lobby" for the election defeat during a leadership hustings in February.
— Gabriel Pogrund (@Gabriel_Pogrund) June 25, 2020
"If the Peake thing was an exception we might be having a different conversation." https://t.co/KCobWs1P8o
This is from Marie van der Zyl, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, welcoming the sacking of Rebecca Long-Bailey.
.@BoDPres Marie van der Zyl thanks @Keir_Starmer for his swift action after Rebecca Long-Bailey retweeted and praised an article containing an antisemitic conspiracy theory pic.twitter.com/kOjsUwWDp2
— Board of Deputies of British Jews (@BoardofDeputies) June 25, 2020
Here is the passage in the Independent’s interview with Maxine Peake referred to in the Labour statement (see 3.11pm) referencing an “antisemitic conspiracy theory”.
Born in Bolton to a lorry driver father and care worker mother, Peake is strident and expressive; if religion wasn’t anathema to her, she’d be perfect in the pulpit. “Systemic racism is a global issue,” she adds. “The tactics used by the police in America, kneeling on George Floyd’s neck, that was learnt from seminars with Israeli secret services.” (A spokesperson for the Israeli police has denied this, stating that “there is no tactic or protocol that calls to put pressure on the neck or airway”.)
As my colleague Peter Walker has reported (see 2.47pm), Rebecca Long-Bailey subsequently posted a tweet saying her tweet sharing the interview was not intended to be an endorsement of everything in it. But the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews said it was “pathetic” that she had not withdrawn the original tweet and apologised.
Updated
Starmer sacks Long-Bailey for sharing article on Twitter including antisemitic conspiracy theory
Rebecca Long-Bailey has been sacked as shadow education secretary, the Labour party has announced. Sir Keir Starmer dismissed her following her Maxine Peake tweet (see 2.47pm). A spokesman for Starmer said:
This afternoon Keir Starmer asked Rebecca Long-Bailey to step down from the shadow cabinet. The article Rebecca shared earlier today contained an antisemitic conspiracy theory. As leader of the Labour Party, Keir has been clear that restoring trust with the Jewish community is a number one priority. Antisemitism takes many different forms and it is important that we all are vigilant against it.
UK records further 149 coronavirus deaths
The Department for Health and Social Care has released its latest coronavirus death figures. It says a further 149 people have died in the UK, taking the headline total to 43,230.
The full details are here.
These figures just cover people who tested positive for coronavirus and died. But the real UK figure for all deaths caused by coronavirus is more than 54,000 once people who did not test positive, but where coronavirus was mentioned on the death certificate, is include.
As of 9am 25 June, there have been 8,710,292 tests, with 167,023 tests on 24 June.
— Department of Health and Social Care (@DHSCgovuk) June 25, 2020
307,980 people have tested positive.
As of 5pm on 24 June, of those tested positive for coronavirus, across all settings, 43,230 have sadly died.
More info:
▶️ https://t.co/xXnL3FU15k pic.twitter.com/fTyhc9I8oH
The Board of Deputies of British Jews has criticised Rebecca Long-Bailey, the shadow education secretary, for tweeting praise of an interview with Maxine Peake in which the actor said the police tactic of kneeling on someone’s neck, which led to the death of George Floyd, was “learnt from seminars with Israeli secret services”, which Israel rejects.
Long-Bailey tweeted, “Maxine Peake is an absolute diamond”, linking to the interview with the Independent.
Maxine Peake is an absolute diamond https://t.co/uzxPEm8VkI
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
She later added: “I retweeted Maxine Peake’s article because of her significant achievements and because the thrust of her argument is to stay in the Labour party. It wasn’t intended to be an endorsement of all aspects of the article.”
I retweeted Maxine Peake’s article because of her significant achievements and because the thrust of her argument is to stay in the Labour Party. It wasn’t intended to be an endorsement of all aspects of the article. https://t.co/3k6P3hcCgJ
— Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 25, 2020
Marie van der Zyl, president of the Board of Deputies, said Long-Bailey should delete her first tweet and apologise. She said:
As soon as we saw that Rebecca Long-Bailey had shared this we wrote to her detailing how this conspiracy theory is false and requesting she delete her tweet and issue an apology. Rebecca Long-Bailey’s response is frankly pathetic. As someone who aspires to be the next education secretary, we would expect her to read and understand materials before sharing them. If she is incapable of doing this, it raises serious and immediate questions about her suitability for the role.
Elsewhere in the interview, Peak, a strong supporter of Jeremy Corbyn, called Keir Starmer “a more acceptable face of the Labour party for a lot of people who are not really leftwing”, adding: “As long as the Tories get out, I don’t care anymore.”
R and coronavirus growth rates remain unchanged for UK, but improving slightly for London, Midlands, North East and Yorkshire
The Government Office for Science has published its latest figures for R, the reproduction number, and the growth rate for coronavirus for the UK and for the English regions.
The headline UK numbers are the same as when the government last published these estimates on Friday last week. The growth rate remains at between minus 4% to minus 2% per day, and R remains at between 0.7 to 0.9.
R and the growth rate are both measures of whether coronavirus infections are increasing or decreasing. But, unlike R, the growth rate also reflects the pace at which this is happening. There is a full explanation of the differences here.
Here are the regional figures.
Although the headline numbers for the UK and for England have not changed since last Friday, in three of the regions the figures have changed. In all three they are getting better.
London: Last week R was between 0.7 and 1, and the growth rate was between -5% and +1%. Now R is between 0.7 and 0.9, and the growth rate is between -6% and 0%.
Midlands: Last week R was between 0.8 and 1, and the growth rate was between -4% and 0%. Now, although the growth rate is unchanged, R is between 0.7 and 0.9.
North East and Yorkshire: Last week R was between 0.7 and 0.9, and the growth rate was between -5% and -1%. Now R is the same, but the growth rate is between -5% and -2%.
This is from Nick Thomas-Symonds, the shadow home secretary, on the street party in Brixton that led to more than 20 police officers being injured.
There were shocking and appalling scenes of unacceptable violence in Brixton overnight. I will be in contact with @metpoliceuk and @PFEW_HQ to enquire after the well-being of the officers affected, and to wish them all a speedy recovery. https://t.co/3kXn9pXyYm
— Nick Thomas-Symonds MP (@NickTorfaen) June 25, 2020
Tony Blair, the former Labour prime minister, is taking part in a Reuters newsmaker Q&A that has just started. There is a live feed at the top of the blog. The conversation is focusing at the moment on a new report from Blair’s thinktank, the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, about the west’s relationship with China.
Here is an extract from Blair’s foreword to the report.
New polling – conducted for YouGov on behalf of the Institute – shows there has been, during the Covid crisis, a sharp move in western public opinion to a markedly more hostile attitude towards China. In our report on the polling, published today, we explore the consequences of this and the need for the west to take a strategic and not ad hoc or purely reactive view of west/China relations. In framing such a strategic view, we should be mindful of distinguishing between two different developments. The first is that we are now dealing not with a rising China but a risen China and this rise is both inevitable and right. China is a large population country – three times the size of the USA – an ancient civilisation with deep roots of intellect and culture, an economic power, a technology innovator, and therefore for sure set to take its place as a global superpower. Given the deep economic links between China and the west, cold war analogies are misleading and dangerous.
On the other hand, in recent years China’s leadership has moved to a much more assertive/aggressive posture, internally and externally, consolidating power in the hands of the Communist party and becoming more combative in its relations with other countries with whom it has disagreements. And in respect of Covid-19, there is no doubt that there are serious questions to be asked of China’s government.
I’ll be posting highlights from the Q&A later.
Nicola Sturgeon has insisted that this week’s switch in policy on Scottish schools returning in August is not a U-turn, but characteristic of the flexibility that dealing with an unpredictable virus demands.
Earlier this week, the education secretary, John Swinney, announced the move to a full-time return with no distancing from planning for blended in-school and at-home education, to allow for social distancing in schools, which had prompted a fierce backlash from parents worried about indefinite home-schooling.
Asked about comments from Swinney this morning that he might not be able to confirm that full-time return until 30 July, Sturgeon said:
None of us have a crystal ball ... I can’t say for certain what the level of virus transmission will be come 11 August so we must continue to plan carefully.
She gave her “commitment and assurance to parents that full-time return to education is what we are planning for”, but underlined that “when dealing with a virus we have to be prepared to assess things much nearer to the time”.
Larry Flanagan, the head of Scotland’s largest teaching union, the Educational Institute of Scotland, yesterday described the move to planning for full-time return as “political” and warned that there were still concerns about the safety of pupils and teachers not distancing. Sturgeon said: “If the science tells us any particular measure isn’t safe we wouldn’t do that, especially with children involved. But all governments have to plan.”
She said that it was not practical to present a fixed and settled plan nearly two months in advance of school return “because we are not dealing with a situation that is fixed and unchangeable, whether that is in schools or hospitals or care homes. If we all take our eye off the ball and the virus gets out of control again [this could all change]. That flexibility we need in our planning is just a fact of life right now.”
Updated
Angela Rayner, the deputy Labour leader, has claimed that Robert Jenrick is protected by an “old boys’ network” in a government which she has described as a “farce”.
Here we go again the untouchables- the old boys network covering for each other. Disgusting! This isn’t a government it’s a farce. Not a spot of integrity amongst them. https://t.co/xLqESNcXnQ
— 🌈 Angela Rayner 🌈 (@AngelaRayner) June 25, 2020
Updated
No 10 backs Robert Jenrick, saying PM now 'considers matter closed'
The Downing Street lobby briefing has finished. Here are the main points.
- Downing Street remains determined to try to draw a line under the row about Robert Jenrick’s attempt to try to rush through approval for a housing development owned by the Tory donor Richard Desmond. Despite being asked repeatedly to justify various aspects of Jenrick’s handling of the affair, the prime minister’s spokesman refused to engage with the details of what happened and instead just repeatedly insisted the PM considered the matter closed. He said:
The PM has spoken with the communities secretary. The communities secretary gave his account in public and to parliament and published the relevant documentation. In light of the account that was given, the PM considers the matter closed.
The spokesman also said Boris Johnson still had full confidence in Jenrick.
- The spokesman was unable to say whether the government fully supported the principle of the community infrastructure levy (CIL), an instrument that councils can use to raise money from developers for infrastructure when they are approving planning applications. The documents released last night showed that Jenrick wanted to approve Desmond’s application quickly so that he would avoid an extra £45m cost being imposed by a new CIL coming into force. Asked if the government as a whole had a view as to whether the CIL was a good idea in principle, the spokesman said he did not have a response at this point but he indicated he would address this later.
- The spokesman defended the government’s decision not to make wearing face coverings compulsory in shops, even though the No 10 review of the 2-metre rule (pdf) published by the government last night proposed this. The spokesman said the government had made wearing face coverings compulsory on public transport (also recommended by the reviews). But shops were different, he said, because people could leave a shop, or choose not to enter, if it became crowded.
- The spokesman defended the government’s test and trace system despite figures out today (see 12.12pm), saying the system is new and “will improve over time”. He also said it had led to more than 100,000 people being told to isolate because they had been in contact with people testing positive for coronavirus, he said.
- The spokesman condemned the violent scenes in Brixton after police came under attack when they tried to break up a large street party. He said:
These were appalling scenes. Violence against the police will not be tolerated.
We have been clear that anyone who assaults the police or any of our emergency service workers who keep us safe should feel the full force of the law.
- The spokesman said the government now has the capacity to carry out 282,498 tests per day.
- The spokesman said the majority of coronavirus tests are returned within 24 hours, and 90% within 48 hours. But he was unable to say exactly how many tests are completed within 24 hours. The government has repeatedly refused to put a figure on this, with ministers and officials claiming figures cannot be released until they are statistically robust. The issue is important because contact tracing systems only work if tests are carried out and contact traced rapidly. But the spokesman said the government remained committed to the target of getting all tests completed within 24 hours by the end of the month.
Updated
Jenrick could face further questioning from Commons housing committee over planning row, chair says
Correspondence between the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, and the Conservative donor Richard Desmond will lead to further scrutiny by MPs, the head of the housing select committee said this morning.
Clive Betts, the chair of the housing communities and local government committee, said Jenrick had given parliament the impression that his contact with the property developer ended after meeting him at a fundraising dinner in November.
However, documents released on last night showed they had “extensive” contact afterwards and raises further questions about the minister’s propriety, Betts said. He told the Guardian:
The committee may well ask the minister to come to talk to us again and write and ask him for more information. The thing that surprised me was the continued connection and exchange of texts [with Desmond] after the dinner. The impression that he gave yesterday [to parliament] was he saw him at the dinner, saw a bit of video and that was it. That was clearly not what happened.
Betts said that he was shocked to see that Jenrick had apparently entertained the possibility of going to visit the site.
The arrangements to go on site would have not been appropriate and he seems to have realised that. There does appear to have been an error of judgment over his involvement.
Betts said the committee could launch an inquiry into when ministers should withdraw from planning decisions. “We should look at when ministers should withdraw from involvement once they have been lobbied, to ensure that there is not even an appearance of being susceptible to lobbying. In planning matters, appearances are important,” he said.
Asked about the minister Nadhim Zahawi’s comments this morning claiming voters could consider attending Conservative fundraising events if they want to raise planning issues with MPs (see 8.42am), Betts said:
It ought to be made clear that there is no connection between donation and planning permissions.
Updated
Test and trace figures show performance falling back on three key indicators
Here are the main points from the latest weekly test and trace figures (pdf) published by the Department for Health and Social Care. They cover the period between 11 June and 17 June.
On three of the key indicators, performance is falling behind what it was the week before.
- Some 70.3% of the 6,923 people who tested positive for coronavirus and were referred to the service were reached and asked to provide details of their recent contacts. That is down from 75.2%, the equivalent figure for the previous week.
- Of those people who were reached and asked to provide details of their close contacts, 69.9% were reached within 24 hours. That is down from 77%, the equivalent figure for the previous week.
- And of those people whose names were given to the service because they had been in close contact with someone testing positive, the service reached 81.7% of them to ask them to self-isolate. That is down from 90.9%, the equivalent figure for the previous week.
From the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg
Just been talking to Keir Starmer on his first proper visit outside London since lockdown which is his first proper visit as Labour leader - our interview later on @BBCNews - for now he says Jenrick’s position is now a question of PM’s judgement - but doesn’t say he should quit
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) June 25, 2020
The Department for Health and Social Care has published the latest weekly test and trace figures.
NHS Test and Trace data [11 June - 17 June]
— Department of Health and Social Care (@DHSCgovuk) June 25, 2020
➡️ 6,129 positive cases transferred to service
➡️ 70% reached to provide contacts
➡️ 30,286 contacts identified
➡️ 82% of identified contacts were reached and advised to self-isolate
Read the full report ⬇️https://t.co/6GPoWOaf9j
I will take a more detailed look at the figures shortly.
Here is my colleague Matthew Weaver’s story about the violence at the mass street party in Brixton.
Some of the best reporting on the coronavirus coverage has come from Radio’s 4 statistics factcheck programme, More or Less. In particular, it has been looking at the reliability of the government’s testing statistics in detail, and generally its verdict has been withering.
But now Tim Harford, the programme’s presenter, has tried using a home testing kit himself, and the experience has left him more sceptical than ever about the value of the oft-quoted statistic given by ministers for the number of tests being carried out per day. Four categories of test contribute to the overall number, but a large proportion are tests sent to people to use at home which count in the official figures when they get sent out. Harford thinks many of them never get returned. He explains why here.
1/ For many weeks now, @katelamble has been reporting on @BBCMoreOrLess about the government's misleading insistence on counting test kits posted out as though the tests had been completed and analysed. The latest news...
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
2/ ...is that I just tried to complete one of these tests as part of the @ONS sampling of the general population. (Bravo, @ONS.) I always wondered how many of these tests were successfully completed. My estimate has plunged sharply...
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
3/ ...It is possible (nay, probable) that I am particularly inept, but I just think a lot of people will struggle with the sheer multi-layered Ikea-self-assembly complexity of it all. I hope not...
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
4/ ...and maybe not everyone will, like me, find themselves having to rip open the sealed envelope to re-label the sample, or fishing around in the rubbish bin for a serial number. (Yes, I did read all the booklets. But there's a lot of detail.)...
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
5/ ...the whole experience drove home that it is not easy for a total amateur, like me, to conduct a medical procedure which is also a statistical procedure in the comfort of one's own kitchen. There is no way all these mailed out tests have been completed...
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
6/ ...but then, as the UK Statistics Authority itself admonished the government, "The aim seems to be to show the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding."
— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) June 25, 2020
The government started to count “tests sent out” in its headline testing numbers (which implies tests completed) near the end of April, when it was under pressure to reach the 100,000 tests a day target set for the end of that month. With help from the new, elastic methodology, the target was supposedly hit. Boris Johnson then set a target of achieving the capacity to carry out 200,000 tests a day by the end of May. This goal was also reached, and now the government says it does not just have the capacity for more than 200,000 tests per day, it is doing more than 200,000 per day.
But these figures have been criticised as misleading, not just because they include tests sent out but not necessarily completed, but because if people provide a swab test (nose and throat) as well as a saliva test, that counts as two tests, not one.
At one point the government also published figures for the number of individuals actually tested per day. But, on the day it supposedly reached the 100,000 target with a headline figure for tests of 122,347, the small print showed that only 73,191 individuals had been tested. The gap between the headline figure and the total for number of individuals actually tested grew ever more embarrassing, and last moth the government stopped publishing a daily figure for the number of individuals tested. It is still not releasing that data, claiming it cannot do so until the data is robust.
Updated
Photograph: Twitter/PA
It’s not just Brixton where there were large gatherings last night after the hottest day of the year so far.
There were reports on hundreds of young people congregating on the seafront in Hove, East Sussex, where police were called after “pockets” of violence broke out.
One witness said the teenagers should have finished their GCSEs and had their prom on Wednesday if it wasn’t for the coronavirus lockdown.
Shocking behaviour impacting upon everyone trying to be responsible in challenging times. @sussex_police will take positive action but I would urge young people to think about their behaviour. A criminal record will not help you get a job in the future. Well done @BtonHovePolice https://t.co/kNISAgILiV
— Jo Shiner (@T_CCJoShiner) June 25, 2020
Large groups were also pictured gathering in the Yorkshire spa town of Harrogate in breach of the coronavirus regulations.
Ok. Night after night we have unofficial #harrogate #COVID festival with apparently no interest from @NYorksPolice nor @Harrogatebc nor media ? @thestrayferret @yorkshirepost @Harrogate_News @HgateAdvertiser pic.twitter.com/dsdtrQwBX8
— roger hattam (@rogerhattam) June 24, 2020
There was also trouble on Exmouth beach in Devon, where hundreds of people gathered before police were called to a “large group of people fighting”.
And this was the scene at the Meadows park in Edinburgh on Wednesday night. One residents said the park looked “like a nightclub” as youngsters gathered to enjoy the warm weather. The crime writer Ian Rankin photographed the rubbish left behind this morning.
I thought I was used to seeing the Meadows busy on a summer evening, but it’s like a big nightclub tonight! pic.twitter.com/jtBuB00DAM
— Ms Marchmont (@lucynorris1) June 24, 2020
Updated
Around 10,000 care home residents and staff will be repeatedly tested for coronavirus in a study forming part of the government’s testing strategy, PA Media reports. The repeat testing will give a “detailed picture” of infections in over 100 care homes in England and allow them to react quickly to outbreaks, the Department of Health and Social Care said.
Helen Whately, the care minister, said:
We know care homes are on the front line of our fight against coronavirus, with the virus affecting older people more acutely than the general population.
Not only will this study provide important reassurance to thousands of residents and staff, it will also build our understanding of the rate of infection in care homes and add to our knowledge about the risk factors that mean the virus can affect individuals differently.
The results of this study will help inform our future plans for managing the pandemic, to protect the public and those who receive care as we work to carefully return to normality.
Footage on social media shows police officers and vehicles being pelted with objects when they attended an illegal music event in Brixton, south-east London, last night.
The disorder broke out after police tried to break up the party, which was in breach of coronavirus lockdown measures. Warning: the footage below contains some bad language.
This is one reason why I say I can never go to a block party because 😱😱 Claire_419er your reporter skills are 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 true definition of it will all end in tears 🙈 pic.twitter.com/HTmVEK0Hkb
— La Fille De Dieu✨🇳🇱🇨🇮🇬🇭 (@emilyadusei) June 25, 2020
On the Today programme this morning Lord Kerslake, the former head of the civil service and the former permanent secretary at the communities department (where Robert Jenrick is secretary of state), said that even though Jenrick “got to the right place in the end”, in that he turned down a follow-up meeting with Richard Desmond to discuss the Westferry development, the documents released last night raised troubling issues. Kerslake explained:
I’m pleased the documents have come out but I do think they have raised some troubling issues, I have to say, about access and influence.
I don’t for a moment suggest the minister took his decision simply because of a donation to the Conservative party.
But the fact is, for the price of a dinner, the developer was able to present his scheme to the minister, follow up with texts and seek to influence the decision.
Kerslake said the fact that Desmond was able to raise the application with Jenrick at a dinner “creates the impression - and appearance here is really important - that the developer has some level of influence over the decisions”.
Updated
Tim Farron, the former Lib Dem leader, has said Robert Jenrick should resign.
Yet again we see its one rule for the Conservatives and another for everyone else.
— Tim Farron (@timfarron) June 25, 2020
Given the Minister has accepted his decision to sign off the project was unlawful, he should also accept that he is unfit to continue in that role and resign immediately. https://t.co/UxqVSgJTFF
The home secretary, Priti Patel, has condemned the “utterly vile scenes” of violence at an illegal gathering in Brixton last night. She said she would immediately raise the issue with Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan police commissioner.
These are utterly vile scenes.
— Priti Patel (@pritipatel) June 25, 2020
Just last weekend, the whole country came together to praise our heroic police officers for putting their own lives on the line to keep us safe.
I'll be picking up with the Met Commissioner immediately. https://t.co/576qcLY89g
Updated
Agenda for the day
Good morning. I’m Andrew Sparrow, joining the blog for the day.
Here is the agenda showing what’s coming up.
9.30am: The Office for National Statistics is due to publish its latest figures on coronavirus and the economy. It is also publishing today its latest coronavirus infection survey results.
11am: The Department for Health and Social Care is due to publish its weekly test and trace figures.
12pm: Downing Street lobby briefing.
Lunchtime: The government is due to publish its business and planning bill. As Heather Stewart reports, it will allow summer fairs, outdoor markets and car boot sales to be held without planning permission in England, while alcohol will be widely available to take away, under what are designed to be new feel-good laws drawn up by ministers.
1.30pm: Sir Keir Starmer holds a “Call Keir” virtual public meeting with people from Lanarkshire.
2pm: Tony Blair, the former Labour PM, takes part in a Reuters newsmaker Q&A.
4pm: Jeremy Hunt, the chair of the Commons health committee, takes part in a Politico Europe Q&A.
Updated
More than 20 police officers injured at illegal music event in Brixton
The Metropolitan police have said 22 officers were injured and police vehicles damaged when they attended a large unlicensed music event in breach of the coronavirus lockdown on Wednesday night.
Footage on social media showed a number of police vehicles being smashed and officers chased during a confrontation with a large crown near the Angell Town estate in Brixton, south-east London.
The Met police said a group of people became hostile when officers encouraged them to leave the event. It said 22 officers were injured, including two who required hospital treatment, though none of the injuries are thought to be serious.
Four people were arrested for assault and public order offences, the force said, adding that gatherings like these were “unlawful, as well as posing a risk to public health and against coronavirus restrictions”.
Met police commander Colin Wingrove said:
Our role is to protect the public and ensure guidelines are adhered to in order to prevent the spread of Covid-19 protecting the NHS and save lives. Our officers work incredibly hard to engage and explain the public health message and regulations to prevent such gatherings occurring.
Updated
Business minister suggests voters should attend Tory fundraising dinners to get special access
The business minister, Nadhim Zahawi, denied that Jenrick’s approval of Richard Desmond’s housing scheme represented “special treatment for a billionaire” in a testy interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
Zahawi insisted that “there is no smoking gun” and that Jenrick had allowed a different minister to decide on the approval of the £1bn plan when there was a “perception of bias”.
However, Zahawi was then questioned about the special access bought by Desmond at a £900-a-head dinner at which he showed Jenrick a video of the scheme and swapped mobile numbers with the housing secretary.
Asked by the Today presenter Justin Webb what message this sent to the ordinary Conservative voter in Doncaster or Ashfield who would not enjoy this kind of access to a government minister, Zahawi said:
If people go to a fundraiser in their local area, in Doncaster, for the Conservative party they’d be sitting next to MPs and other people in their local authority. People can act with different parts of that authority.
He added:
The important this [is] the access didn’t buy this billionaire the decision. The secretary of state very clearly said to Richard Desmond: ‘I can’t see you, I can’t have this meeting’.
Zahawi’s suggestion that voters should go to Tory fundraising dinners if they want special access to decision-makers has been picked up by Westminster journalists:
Nadhim Zahawi running into trouble on @BBCr4today, where he seems to suggest that voters who want Richard Desmond-level access to govt ministers should, as he did, go to Tory fundraising dinners.
— Robert Hutton (@RobDotHutton) June 25, 2020
Did I really just hear Nadhim Zahawi say that if Tory supporters in Doncaster and Ashfield go to a party fundraiser they will get access to councillors etc?
— Joe Murphy (@JoeMurphyLondon) June 25, 2020
Updated
The former leader of the Conservative group on Tower Hamlets council, who resigned over Robert Jenrick’s decision to approve the housing scheme against the advice of his own officials, has posted an interesting thread on the documents released last night.
Councillor Andrew Wood is the secretary of the Isle of Dogs neighbourhood planning forum so he knows the intricacies of the story probably better than most. He resigned in February, saying Jenrick’s overruling of the local planning inspector was “so shocking I knew immediately that I had to resign”.
Wood says the emails and texts released last night showed discrepancies in Jenrick’s account:
Thread on latest news from release of documents earlier today on Westferry Printworks, Robert Jenricks decision to approve it
— Andrew Wood (@Andrewwood17) June 24, 2020
In short I was right to resign
-Jenrick discussed more at dinner then 1st said
-Overrode his own officials advice
-Viability £
1/https://t.co/PTSgvqdWKB
To Daily Mail @MrHarryCole Jenrick said "But Mr Jenrick insisted he shut the conversation down immediately"
— Andrew Wood (@Andrewwood17) June 24, 2020
Then evidence emerges:
- They talked about new Local Plan (not mentioned before)
- Dispute over how long watched video for, Jenrick a few moments, Desmond 3-4 minutes
2/ pic.twitter.com/sKx1gXOCWi
- Arranged to meet for site visit (agreed as 19th Dec two days laters)
— Andrew Wood (@Andrewwood17) June 24, 2020
- Jenrick initiates text conversation night of dinner with Desmond, good mates after 1st meeting
This is much more then shutting down conversation immediately
Jenrick sat between Desmond & Martin at dinner
3/ pic.twitter.com/lOyidCJyyl
Representatives of one of Scotland’s most popular national parks, Loch Lomond and the Trossachs, which is also the closest park to big cities like Glasgow and Edinburgh, have written to the Scottish government begging for help with what they describe as increasingly serious health, hygiene and safety issues as more and more day-trippers ignore the current five-mile travel limit.
Destination National Park Group and the Friends of Loch Lomond describe visitors going to the toilet on public beaches, in woodlands and in local residents’ gardens; dangerous roadside parking and tailbacks in towns and villages where the car parks have remained closed; and littering at a scale not seen in the national park for many years.
The letter goes on:
We would earnestly ask for your assistance in encouraging public sector bodies to start quietly re-opening their car park and toilet facilities to help ease the very real problems being encountered on the ground which are impacting adversely on the health and wellbeing of local residents and visitors.”
With the five-mile limit lifting on 3 July, these concerns are only likely to get worse if car parks and toilet facilities remain closed.
Back in the city, crime writer Ian Rankin, who lives near the Meadows, a large and popular city centre park in Edinburgh, has been documenting litter and unending outdoor micturition on sunny days:
The Meadows this morning... pic.twitter.com/XxIUS89s9G
— Ian Rankin (@Beathhigh) June 25, 2020
We reported on the problems being caused across the UK by closure of public toilets at the start of the month. Let Libby know on Twitter if things have improved in your area recently.
Updated
Robert Jenrick leads the front pages of five of the national newspapers in England this morning, including the Daily Mail, the Guardian and the Times.
The Daily Mail splashes on the “cosy texts that damn minister”. Its columnist Stephen Glover says Jenrick must resign, in a piece headlined: “This haughty and reckless minister is now a drag on the Tories.”
MAIL: Cosy texts that damn minister #TomorrowsPapersToday pic.twitter.com/oBuiDUjcLl
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) June 24, 2020
The Times’ leader column says the emails and text messages released on Wednesday night leave Jenrick with “many more questions to answer”. It writes that Jenrick is “not the victim of confected outrage”, whatever he or his supporters might say, and that his cases suggests some in government see transparency as “a burden”.
THE TIMES: Pressure mounts on minister #TomorrowsPapersToday pic.twitter.com/hEVaWjRaco
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) June 24, 2020
The Guardian sets out its view in this leader column, which says: “Without the hefty Conservative majority and Mr Johnson’s own relaxed attitude to personal responsibility, Mr Jenrick would surely have left by now. The pandemic still consumes public attention which might otherwise turn to the case. Nonetheless, it exacerbates the perception that there is one rule for this government and its friends and another for the rest of us.”
Guardian front page, Thursday 25 June 2020: Jenrick under pressure to quit as Tory donor documents released pic.twitter.com/kju548o80Y
— Guardian news (@guardiannews) June 24, 2020
Updated
The senior Tory MP, Bernard Jenkin, is backing calls for a “rapid” review of the government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic but said it should not take the place of a full public inquiry.
Jenkin, the chair of the Commons liaison committee, said the review would “ensure that every stone has been turned over and looked under” and take the form of the parliamentary banking standards committee, established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he said the review should scrutinise governance, constitutional weaknesses, use of scientific advice, coordination across government, and the disproportionality of deaths of people from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds.
“Select committees are doing this scrutiny piecemeal all the time; the question is how can you bring this select committee scrutiny together,” he said.
Jenkin was also asked about Robert Jenrick, the housing secretary under pressure over his dealings with the property tycoon Richard Desmond.
Jenkin said he suspected “the storm will pass” and backed his colleague to remain in post. He added:
The cabinet secretary has been very clear that there’s no case to answer. Clearly there’s been a little bit of a mistake, where decisions have had to be rescinded, but there’s no sign of actual maladministration. And secondly, in these things what happens next depends on whether anything new comes out, and it looks as though he’s put everything on the table.
Updated
Good morning and welcome to the UK liveblog.
It takes something big to knock coronavirus off the front pages but the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, has succeeded this morning.
Jenrick backed the former media mogul Richard Desmond’s plans to build 1,500 flats on the Isle of Dogs in east London in mid-January, overruling the objections of planning officers and the local council.
The Guardian, Times, Daily Mail and i all lead on the release of documents last night that show Jenrick “insisted” a planning decision for a £1bn property development should be rushed through so a Tory donor’s company could reduce costs by £45m. The documents also reveal that Jenrick gave Desmond his private mobile number after he was sat next to the former Daily Express owner at a £900-a-head dinner, following which they swapped messages.
Boris Johnson indicated last night that he was sticking by Jenrick, but the pressure on the housing secretary is building this morning.
We will also have all the day’s live developments on the coronavirus pandemic. There are reports this morning that the government will on Monday confirm which European countries Britons will be able to visit without having to go into quarantine when they return to the UK.