Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chronicle Live
Chronicle Live
National
Ben O'Connell

Two Northumberland housing plans on same road refused over green belt fears

Two bids for new homes on a Northumberland road, which has seen plenty of development in recent years, have been turned down by councillors.

Two proposed developments on Stannington Station Road in Stannington were both unanimously rejected by the Castle Morpeth Local Area Council because they are in the green belt.

The first scheme was for a detached, four-bedroom house on land west of 65 Station Road.

The applicant's agent, Tony Carter, said that this site was not in an isolated location and is within the settlement, which would be marked by 77 Station Road, 200 metres further east.

New special school to be built in Blyth after successful Government bid 

He continued that the proposal was "clearly infill" - an exception which can be allowed in the green belt - because there are "stark similarities to recent approvals for infill elsewhere on Station Road".

Mr Carter added that this was one of several inconsistencies being displayed by the council's planners in relation to this application.

But, in response to their questions, the councillors were told that the green belt has to be "very carefully justified" now that the authority can demonstrate that it has a housing land supply of more than five years.

A map showing the green-belt extension boundaries from the submission draft of the Northumberland Local Plan. Sites in orange have planning permission for housing (Copyright Unknown)

Planning officer Tamsin Wood added: "Each application on Station Road has been considered very carefully. Some were infill for a good reason, some were on previously developed land. This is not infill."

This was followed by an outline application for five homes on land North East of 63 Station Road.

A statement from the applicant's agent, read out on his behalf in his absence, made similar arguments to Mr Carter, suggesting this site is "almost identical in circumstances to land at number 33".

'We are not racist': Anger after criticism from Show Racism the Red Card sparks negative publicity 

But, once again, this view was not shared by the council's planning officer, as outlined in her report.

The applicant and a supporter also highlighted that this development would provide much-needed bungalows, two of which would meet the higher category three building regulations, meaning that they are suitable for wheelchair users.

Coun Richard Wearmouth said: "It doesn't go without some thought about what the applicant says, but I don't really think this is infill."

Two new sightseeing buses to launch across Tyneside from this weekend

Discover our Land: Share and celebrate Northumberland's stories and its people 

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.