Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
National
Stephen Rex Brown

Trump not immune from Manhattan District Attorney's demand for tax returns, appeals court rules

NEW YORK _ President Trump is not entitled to Oval Office immunity that would block Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance from demanding copies of his tax returns, an appeals court ruled Monday.

The 34-page ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is another defeat for Trump in the legal battle over his tax returns. Vance's request for the records is on hold as the case makes it way to the Supreme Court.

Vance is seeking eight years of Trump's taxes in connection with an investigation into hush money payments Trump made to women during the 2016 presidential campaign. Vance served the subpoena on Trump's accounting firm, Mazars USA.

"We are not faced, in this case, with the president's arrest or imprisonment, or with an order compelling him to attend court at a particular time or place, or, indeed, with an order that compels the president himself to do anything. The subpoena at issue is directed not to the president, but to his accountants; compliance does not require the president to do anything at all," Judge Robert Katzmann wrote for the three-judge panel.

"There is no obvious reason why a state could not begin to investigate a president during his term and, with the information secured during that search, ultimately determine to prosecute him after he leaves office."

Trump's attorneys had made a remarkably broad argument about Trump's presidential immunity, claiming it extended to his associates and businesses. Trump attorney William Consovoy drew incredulous laughter during a hearing before the Appeals Court last month when he said the president couldn't be arrested if he actually shot someone on Fifth Ave.

The appeals court avoided thorny questions about presidential powers and Vance's authority as a local prosecutor.

"The subpoena seeks only the president's private tax returns and financial information relating to the businesses he owns in his capacity as a private citizen," the court wrote. "These documents do not implicate, in any way, the performance of his official duties."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.