The Trump administration is being accused of “stonewalling” Congress by ignoring a deadline for the Treasury to hand over Donald Trump's tax returns and defying a subpoena requesting ex-personal security director Carl Kline appear before a House investigative committee.
“It appears that the president believes that the Constitution does not apply to his White House, that he may order officials at will to violate their legal obligations, and that he may obstruct attempts by Congress to conduct oversight,” said Elijah Cummings, chairman of the House Oversight Committee.
President Trump made his feelings on Democrat-led investigations in the wake of the Mueller report perfectly clear in an interview on Tuesday, stating: “There is no reason to go any further, and especially in Congress where it’s very partisan - obviously very partisan. I don’t want people testifying to a party, because that is what they’re doing if they do this.”
He continued to attack the special counsel and ongoing congressional investigations Wednesday, telling reporters before departing the White House his administration is "fighting all the subpoenas."
“We have been – I have been – the most transparent president and administration in the history of our country by far,” Mr Trump said.
“We’re fighting all the subpoenas. These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020," he added.
He added that he “thought after two years we’d be finished with it," referring to the investigations surrounding his campaign.
Meanwhile, Democrats have stepped up their enquiries in the aftermath of the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference.
One congressional subpoena the administration is expected to challenge has gone out to Don McGahn, former White House counsel who cooperated with Mr Mueller.
And the White House is pushing back on other fronts, including House Democratic efforts to obtain Mr Trump’s tax returns and his business’ financial records.
Additional reporting by AP. Check out The Independent's live coverage from Washington below.
Hello and welcome to The Independent's rolling coverage of the Donald Trump administration.
The Trump administration is facing growing questions over its apparent reluctance to co-operate further with congressional committees investigating the president’s affairs in the aftermath of the Mueller report.
Speaking to The Washington Post yesterday, the president said: “There is no reason to go any further, and especially in Congress where it’s very partisan - obviously very partisan. I don’t want people testifying to a party, because that is what they’re doing if they do this.”
His words came as a former White House personal security director Carl Kline defied a subpoena and the Treasury Department ignored a deadline set by the House Ways and Means committee for providing President Trump's tax returns, which passed at 5pm EST yesterday.
Representative Elijah Cummings, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, angry at the developments, said the White House has adopted the "untenable" position that it can ignore requests from the Democratic majority in the House.
"It appears that the president believes that the Constitution does not apply to his White House, that he may order officials at will to violate their legal obligations, and that he may obstruct attempts by Congress to conduct oversight," Cummings said in a statement.
Carl Kline did not show up Tuesday for a scheduled deposition and Cummings said he is consulting with other members of Congress and staff about scheduling a vote to hold Kline in contempt. The committee subpoenaed Kline after one of his former subordinates, Tricia Newbold, told the panel that dozens of people in Trump's administration were granted security clearances despite "disqualifying issues" in their backgrounds.
Regarding the president’s tax returns, Ways and Means Committee chairman Richard Neal received a letter from treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin asking for more time and said he would give the panel a final decision by 6 May.
Mnuchin told Neal that he is consulting with the Justice Department "due to the serious constitutional questions raised by this request and the serious consequences that a resolution of those questions could have for taxpayer privacy."
Neal hasn't announced next steps, but he could opt to issue a subpoena to enforce his demand, sent under a 1924 law that requires the Treasury secretary to furnish any tax return requested by a handful of lawmakers with responsibility over the Internal Revenue Service.
The White House’s attempt to stonewall the House follows Trump and his business organisation suing Elijah Cummings on Monday to block a subpoena from the Oversight Committee that seeks years of the president's financial records. The complaint, filed in federal court in Washington, said a subpoena from Cummings "has no legitimate legislative purpose" and accused Democrats of harassing Trump.
Cummings said the White House "has refused to produce a single piece of paper or a single witness" in any of the panel's investigations this year. Democrats took control of the House in January.
The back and forth over Kline's testimony played out in a series of letters over the past month between the White House, the Oversight Committee and Kline's lawyer. The White House demanded that one of its lawyers attend the deposition to ensure executive privilege was protected, but Cummings rejected that request. The White House then ordered Kline, who now works at the Pentagon, to defy the subpoena.
Cummings said the committee has for years required that witnesses are represented only by their own counsel.
"There are obvious reasons we need to conduct our investigations of agency malfeasance without representatives of the office under investigation," Cummings said in a statement.
A spokesman for the top Republican on the Oversight panel, Ohio representative Jim Jordan, said Cummings was choosing confrontation over cooperation.
"Chairman Cummings rushed to a subpoena in his insatiable quest to sully the White House," said Russell Dye.
The Oversight panel has been investigating security clearances issued to senior officials, including Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former White House aide Rob Porter.
Tricia Newbold, an 18-year government employee who oversaw the issuance of clearances for some senior White House aides, told the committee earlier this year that she compiled a list of at least 25 officials who were initially denied security clearances last year because of their backgrounds. But she said senior Trump aides overturned those decisions, moves she said weren't made "in the best interest of national security."
According to a committee memo, Newbold said the disqualifying issues included foreign influence, conflicts of interest, financial problems, drug use, personal conduct and criminal conduct.
Newbold said she raised her concerns up the chain of command in the White House to no avail. Instead, she said, the White House retaliated, suspending her in January for 14 days without pay for not following a new policy requiring that documents be scanned as separate PDF files rather than one single PDF file. Kline was Newbold's supervisor.
Newbold said when she returned to work in February, she was cut out of the security clearance process and removed from a supervisory responsibility.
All of this comes as the House Judiciary Committee hopes to make a star witness of Don McGahn, the former White House counsel described in the Mueller report as repeatedly standing up to President Trump. Chairman Jerrold Nadler hopes to have him testify in support of their investigation into whether Trump used his office to obstruct justice.
Since the 18 April release of FBI special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and any ties to Republican Trump's campaign, Democrats have seen McGahn as someone who could be as important as Mueller himself.
But the Democrats are likely to face Trump's resistance. The Washington Post reported on Tuesday that the White House planned to oppose a subpoena by the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for McGahn to testify, claiming executive privilege, a legal doctrine allowing the president to withhold information about internal executive branch deliberations from other branches of government.
Mueller's 448-page partially blacked-out report portrayed McGahn as one of the few figures in Trump's orbit to challenge him when he tried to shut down the investigation that has clouded his more than two years in the White House.
"Mr McGahn has been touted as a man of integrity and he is a major witness in the Mueller report," said Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee, a member of the Judiciary Committee.
Democrats are particularly interested in hearing McGahn describe in his own words and in Congress an account in the Mueller report in which McGahn refused Trump's instructions.
In June 2017, Trump called McGahn to say he should tell deputy attorney-general Rod Rosenstein to remove the special counsel because he had conflicts of interest, the report said.
Trump also failed to get McGahn to dispute media reports that the president tried to fire Mueller, the report said.
"That, in itself, could be an obstruction of justice, as Mr McGahn would be able to testify that he was asked to do it and then asked not to tell anyone what he’d been asked to do," Lee said.
“Nobody disobeys my orders,” Trump insisted to reporters at the White House on Easter Monday.
Chairman Nadler, who has subpoenaed the US Department of Justice to provide the unredacted Mueller report and underlying evidence, issued a subpoena on Monday for McGahn to provide the committee with documents by 7 May and testify in person on 21 May.
But it was not clear that McGahn would comply, especially if the White House asserts executive privilege. Nor could Democrats predict how much the former White House counsel would be willing to discuss, even if he does testify.
On Tuesday evening, Nadler said: "The moment for the White House to assert some privilege to prevent this testimony from being heard has long since passed."
The House of Representatives has the sole power under the US Constitution to impeach the president, and any effort would be led by the judiciary panel.
Mueller's report concluded that there was not enough evidence to establish that Trump’s campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow. The report outlined multiple instances, however, where Trump tried to thwart Mueller's probe.
Mueller stopped short of concluding whether Trump could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice, a criminal charge that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Such a high standard would not apply to Democrats if they decided to bring impeachment proceedings.
In the days following the Mueller report's release, McGahn came under attack from Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, who called into question the veracity of his statements to Mueller's team of prosecutors.
"I would ask which of the three versions is McGahn standing by. There are three versions he gives of that account," Giuliani told CNN over the weekend. "I'm telling you, he's confused."
A prominent elections lawyer, McGahn served as Trump's campaign counsel before being named White House counsel in November 2016.
He played a pivotal role in helping Trump reshape the federal judiciary in a conservative direction and roll back regulations on a range of industries.
But it was not clear that McGahn would comply, especially if the White House asserts executive privilege. Nor could Democrats predict how much the former White House counsel would be willing to discuss, even if he does testify.
On Tuesday evening, Nadler said: "The moment for the White House to assert some privilege to prevent this testimony from being heard has long since passed."
The House of Representatives has the sole power under the US Constitution to impeach the president, and any effort would be led by the judiciary panel.
Mueller's report concluded that there was not enough evidence to establish that Trump’s campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow. The report outlined multiple instances, however, where Trump tried to thwart Mueller's probe.
Mueller stopped short of concluding whether Trump could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice, a criminal charge that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Such a high standard would not apply to Democrats if they decided to bring impeachment proceedings.
In the days following the Mueller report's release, McGahn came under attack from Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, who called into question the veracity of his statements to Mueller's team of prosecutors.
"I would ask which of the three versions is McGahn standing by. There are three versions he gives of that account," Giuliani told CNN over the weekend. "I'm telling you, he's confused."
A prominent elections lawyer, McGahn served as Trump's campaign counsel before being named White House counsel in November 2016.
He played a pivotal role in helping Trump reshape the federal judiciary in a conservative direction and roll back regulations on a range of industries.
As Democrats continue to pore over the Mueller report underlining and highlighting key passages, many within the party remain at odds with House speaker Nancy Pelosi on the question of initiating impeachment proceedings against President Trump regarding his attempts to obstruct justice - only prevented, according to Bob Mueller, by the defiance of McGahn and other concerned colleagues.
Many are now in favour of impeachment, including Maxine Waters, chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, whose tweet below reflects the feelings of many frustrated Democrats on Capitol Hill.
President Trump, naturally keen to draw a line under the "Witch Hunt Hoax", tweeted his fury about what he regards as ongoing Democratic persecution last night.
Yesterday afternoon Trump met with the CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, in the Oval Office, just hours after using the social media site to bemoan it as discriminatory towards Republicans, accusing Twitter of playing "political games".
The meeting and morning rant came as news broke that Twitter had deactivated roughly 5,000 pro-Trump bots on the platform for pushing out disinformation last week alongside the release of the Mueller report.
Here's Clark Mindock's report.
President Trump's specific gripe for Dorsey, according to those in the know, was that he has fewer followers than his predecessor Barack Obama, which he felt must be down to Silicon Valley dweebs fiddling the numbers to suit their liberal bias.
Here's Tom Embury-Dennis with more.
With the Mueller report still very much the talk of Washington, commentators continue to look back to the Watergate scandal for precedent.
Former prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste, known for his part in Richard Nixon's downfall, yesterday told The Hill he felt attorney-general William Barr had carried out a "mischaracterisation" of the conclusions of its author.
Here's Chris Riotta's report.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday announced his intention to name a community in the Golan Heights after Donald Trump as a thank you for the US president's controversial decision to recognise Israeli sovereignty over the disputed territory.
Trump will like that. As we know, he believes on putting his name on things.
"If he was smart, he would've put his name on it," Trump said of George Washington and his Mount Vernon plantation in Virginia in conversation with French president Emmanuel Macron when the pair visited in April 2018.
"You've got to put your name on stuff or no one remembers you."
Trump remains as humourless and embittered towards the White House Correspondents' Dinner as ever and has now banned his staff from attending the Saturday night gala for the Washington press corps.
The president himself will duck out of the traditional presidential roast for the third consecutive year and will instead address a campaign rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin. After Trump was excoriated by stand-up comedian Michelle Wolf last April, the White House has moved to break with custom and not have a comic compere this year, opting for historian Ron Chernow as host instead.
Seth Meyers and Barack Obama have had particular fun at Trump's expense in the past, with President Obama sending up the "birther" conspiracy theory peddled by Trump regarding his country of origin by playing a clip from Disney's The Lion King (1994) and predicting a Trump White House emblazoned with trashy signage and a jacuzzi out front for Playboy models.
With the Department of Homeland Security still in disarray following the resignation of Kirstjen Nielsen two weeks ago and Trump's "border czar" yet to be appointed, the shadowy hand of adviser Stephen Miller continues to be seen through the draconian anti-immigration measures under consideration.
Not content with separating the children of asylum seekers from their parents and detaining them in cages at the US-Mexico border, the Trump administration is apparently considering dispatching them to Guantanamo Bay, the military prison in Cuba that became notorious during George W Bush's War on Terror.
Here's Clark Mindock's report.
Speaking of Nielsen, The New York Times reports this morning she wanted to redirect the focus of the Department of Homeland Security towards preparing for new forms of Russian election interference in 2020 but was discouraged from doing so by the White House before being forced out.
Acting chief-of-staff Mick Mulvaney warned her not to raise the question of cyber-defence with President Trump despite new evidence emerging of Russian hacking taking place during the 2018 midterms.
Activity originating from Eastern Europe "ranging from its search for new techniques to divide Americans using social media, to experiments by hackers, to rerouting internet traffic and infiltrating power grids" had become a concern for Nielsen, according to The Times.
All of which amounts to a great deal more than "buying some Facebook ads to try to sow dissent", as Jared Kusher disingenuously characterised it at the Time 100 Summit in New York on Tuesday.
Donald Trump's upcoming visit to the UK between 3 and 5 June has caused quite a stir since it was announced yesterday.
The inflatable Baby Trump will apparently take to the skies once more, further protests are planned and MPs from David Lammy to Emily Thornberry have expressed disgust at prime minister Theresa May toadying up to the White House in search of friendly post-Brexit trading and diplomatic relations.
Thornberry suggested in PMQs this morning Trump ought to be sat between naturalist David Attenborough and teen environmental activist Greta Thunberg to discuss climate change when he arrives in London.
The speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, is also under pressure to row back his stance on allowing Trump to address Parliament.
Trump is awake and attempting to redirect the narrative back towards the border.
He's also peddling a lively new conspiracy theory convenient to his "witch hunt" line.
White House director of strategic communications Mercedes Schlapp is on holiday in Italy at present and claims she saw the Pope.
How nice.
She's still finding time to check her phone in the piazzas of the Eternal City though and is busying joining in with her boss's vile anti-immigration scaremongering.
Why not have an espresso old girl and leave us all alone?
Here's a useful round-up of this morning's events from CNN's New Day.
In his latest tweet, Mr Trump has threatened to "head to the Supreme Court" to fight Democrats if they try to launch impeachment proceedings against him.
The tweet comes as UK intelligence calls Mr Trump "ridiculous".
Mr Trump has added a second tweet about the Supreme Court and impeachment.
