House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler is planning a vote on Wednesday on a motion to subpoena special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on ties between Donald Trump and Russia and demand testimony from at least four former top Trump aides.
The report is still under review by attorney-general William Barr but Mr Nadler has lost patience and hopes to issue him with a “hurry up” notice and call up Mr Trump’s ex-chief strategist Steve Bannon, former director of strategic communications Hope Hicks, ex-White House Counsel Don McGahn and former chief of staff Reince Priebus to appear before his committee.
President Trump has meanwhile repeated his threat to shutdown the US border with Mexico in protest at what he regards as America’s neighbour’s failure to tackle northbound illegal immigration and called on the Democrats to help fix asylum “loopholes”.
Mr Mueller's report was delivered to the Justice Department a week and a half ago, marking an end to a nearly two year investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.
The attorney general's office then sent a letter to Congress just two days later, detailing in broad strokes the findings of the investigation. Mr Barr wrote in that letter that the Mueller probe found no evidence of collusion or conspiracy between the Russian efforts and the Trump campaign. Mr Barr then noted that the Mueller probe did not make a judgement on whether Mr Trump had committed obstruction of justice — and the attorney general said that he had determined that charges were not warranted.
The information in the letter has been celebrated by Mr Trump, who has insisted repeatedly during the first two years of his campaign that he and his campaign had not colluded with the Russian meddling.
The Mueller report did, however, note that dozens of Russian individuals or groups were involved in an effort to sway the election for Mr Trump.
Without providing evidence, he also accused the nations of having "set up" migrant caravans and sending them north. The president last raised the issue of refugee convoys ahead of November's midterms, when he spread unsubstantiated claims to demonise a group crossing Mexico from Honduras to ensure border security led the national political agenda as voters headed for the ballot box.
Speaking to ABC's This Week show, White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said the president had few other options in the absence of any support from Democrats for more border security or legislative action to change the immigration law.
"Faced with those limitations, the president will do everything he can. If closing the ports of entry means that, that's exactly what he intends to do," Mulvaney said. "We need border security and we're going to do the best we can with what we have."
White House adviser Kellyanne Conway told Fox News Sunday that the situation at the border was at "melting point" and said the president was serious in his threat. "It certainly is not a bluff. You can take the president seriously."
Trump has repeatedly said during his two years in office that he would close the US border with Mexico. His latest threat had workers and students who frequently cross the border worried about the potential disruption to their lives.
Closing the border could disrupt millions of legal crossings and billions of dollars in trade.
Mexico is the largest importer of US exports of refined fuels like diesel and gasoline, some of which moves by rail. It is unclear if rail terminals would be affected by closures.
"It would have a widespread and dramatic impact on our markets almost immediately," said an executive at a company that ships products by rail to Mexico, citing its dependence on US natural gas, propane, gasoline and ultra-low-sulphur diesel fuel.
"What we need to do is focus on what's happening in Central America, where three countries are disassembling before our eyes and people are desperately coming to the United States. The president's cutting off aid to these countries will not solve that problem," Senate minority whip Dick Durbin told NBC's Meet the Press.
Durbin also cast doubt on the viability of shutting the border, describing the threat as "totally unrealistic."
Here's Greg Evans for Indy100 on Fox News's description of the above three nations as "three Mexican countries", the president's favourite channel apparently having little better grasp of regional geography than the man himself.
Two federal judges in Washington, DC, last week blocked parts of Trump's healthcare agenda: work requirements for some low-income people on Medicaid and new small business health plans that don't have to provide full benefits required by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
But in the biggest case, a federal judge in Texas ruled last December that the ACA is unconstitutional and should be struck down in its entirety. That ruling is now on appeal. At the urging of the White House, the Justice Department said last week it will support the Texas judge's position and argue that all of "Obamacare" must go.
A problem for Trump is that the litigation could take months to resolve - or longer - and there's no guarantee he'll get the outcomes he wants before the 2020 election.
In the Texas case, Trump could lose by winning.
"The ACA now is nine years old and it would be incredibly disruptive to uproot the whole thing," said Thomas Barker, an attorney who served as a lawyer at the federal Health and Human Services department under George W Bush. "It seems to me that you can resolve this issue more narrowly than by striking down the ACA."
The case "probably ends up in the Supreme Court," he continued. "But we're doing something that is going to be much less expensive than Obamacare for the people... and we're going to have (protections for) pre-existing conditions and will have a much lower deductible. So, and I've been saying that, the Republicans are going to end up being the party of healthcare."
There's no sign that his administration has a comprehensive healthcare plan and there doesn't seem to be a consensus among Republicans in Congress.

Bernie Sanders says 'thousands of people will literally die' if Donald Trump scraps Obamacare
Vermont senator says he would slash cost of medicines if elected presidentHis spokeswoman, Amanda Miller, said the president's son had been buttonholed by reporters while waiting to speak with Sean Hannity of Fox. "Unfortunately, he did not have an opportunity to run a full FBI background check on each and every one," she said.
The site is known for trading in paranoid rumours about surreptitious government takeovers by deep state lizardmen and talk of secret death squads carrying out mass shootings.
Please allow a moment for our liveblog to load









