Donald Trump has said drug cartels are “in total control of the Mexico side of the Southern Border” as he orders sweeping reforms to the US's immigration system.
The plans introduced in a memo by attorney-general William Barr and acting homeland security secretary Kevin McAleenan would see impoverished asylum seekers required to pay a fee to have their applications and work permits processed and migrants who have attempted to enter the US illegally prevented from receiving employment authorisation before any relief or protection is granted.
The president is meanwhile suing Deutsche Bank and Capital One to prevent them complying with House subpoenas and handing over records of his financial dealings with them as former adviser Roger Stone appeared in court Tuesday.
Stone, a longtime confidant of Mr Trump, appeared for a brief status conference after being charged in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation with lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering.
His attorneys want to be able to view the full report as they prepare for trial. Material relating to Stone’s case was blacked out in the report.
Jonathan Kravis, an assistant US attorney, says the government has no obligation to provide the information Stone seeks. He says prosecutors have already given Stone significant information, including grand jury testimony and material that may be favourable to his defence.
The president also met with Democratic leaders Tuesday, with Chuck Schumer describing there being “good will” to work together.
Nancy Pelosi and congressional Democrats had asked for the meeting with Mr Trump to discuss launching an ambitious building program that’s a top priority for the party and has been a rare area of potential bipartisan accord with Republicans. Mr Trump, too, has long promised a big infrastructure plan.
The dozen Democratic lawmakers in the meeting with the president called it a constructive start. They said Mr Trump agreed that infrastructure investments should go beyond roads and bridges and include broadband, water systems, and enhancements to the electrical grid.
Additional reporting by AP. Please allow a moment for our liveblog to load
The federal lawsuit, filed in the US District Court's Southern District of New York, contends that the Democrat-controlled House committees have no legitimate or lawful purpose in demanding records from
"The subpoenas were issued to harass President Donald J Trump, to rummage through every aspect of his personal finances, his businesses, and the private information of the President and his family," court documents said.
Nearly four months later, they'll have another crack, with infrastructure seen as the one issue with the best chance for the two sides to work together this Congress - and even that isn't given good odds for a fruitful ending.
The meeting plays out against the backdrop of high tensions over escalating Democratic investigations following the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's report into Russian meddling. Politicians and the president also have on eye on the 2020 elections, meaning every provision of an infrastructure package - including how to pay for it - will be made with that in mind.
More than one "infrastructure week" already has come and gone over the past two years with nothing to show for it. Still, advocates for an infrastructure package boost see a narrow window for action.
"I think a deal can be had if everybody is willing to put their battle axes away for a period," said former Republican representative Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania, who served as chairman of the House's transportation committee for six years.
A compromise could offer political benefits to both sides. Trump's re-election prospects are tied to a strong economy that would get another boost from new road and bridge projects. House Democrats have passed an array of bills that have gone nowhere in the GOP-controlled Senate.
Pelosi has dozens of new Democratic House members who won in competitive districts, said Shuster, and "they need to be able to go home next year and say they've accomplished something."
But the two sides also have some competing priorities that will complicate matters. The president and Republican leaders want to speed up the permitting process for building energy and transportation projects and that's not on most Democratic lawmakers' to-do lists.
The Trump White House has sent conflicting signals on that issue. On Friday, the president tweeted that California's recent 12 cent increase in the state's gas tax was "causing big problems on pricing for that state. Speak to your Governor about reducing."
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee will give every House lawmaker a chance to share their infrastructure priorities on Wednesday.
Then, the committee's chairman, Oregon Democrat Peter DeFazio will lead a delegation to visit a dilapidated, century-old tunnel that connects New Jersey and New York. Experts say a new tunnel is essential to ensuring reliable rail travel throughout the northeast, but the price tag will be steep.
The infrastructure issue has aligned the nation's top business groups and unions, a rarity in Washington. The US Chamber of Commerce has proposed increasing the federal fuel tax 5 cents a year for five years, then allowing it to increase with inflation. The federal tax on gasoline now stands at 18.3 cents per gallon and at 24.3 cents per gallon for diesel fuel. The last time the federal gas tax went up was in 1993.
Ed Mortimer, a vice president at the US Chamber of Commerce, said the group would have the back of lawmakers who face criticism back home for supporting a higher federal gas tax.
"We're going to support any elected official willing to have a serious discussion and vote to raise revenue for infrastructure," Mortimer said.
Earl Blumenauer, another Democratic congressman from Oregon, plans to introduce a bill incorporating the chamber's wishes to gradually raise the fuel tax by 25 cents and then allow the tax to rise with inflation. The bill will also call for eventually replacing the gas tax in favour of a system where drivers pay a user fee based on distance traveled.
"That's the ultimate solution. We can't do that in less than 10 years, but we need to lay the foundation for it," Blumenauer said.
But it's unclear whether Blumenauer will get support from Republican members of Congress, or even top Democratic leaders.
"By reversing only the most egregious giveaways in President Trump's tax bill, those given to the wealthiest of the wealthy, and raising the corporate tax cut a smidge we could finance the entirety of a $1 trillion (£771bn) infrastructure bill," Schumer said.
UNHCR spokesman Charlie Yaxley told Reuters: "People shouldn't be charged financially to exercise that right."
The UNHCR upholds compliance with a 1951 treaty, ratified by the United States, that says people fleeing conflict and persecution deserve international protection and safe refuge in another country.
The moves are the latest effort by the Trump administration to stem a growing number of Central American migrants crossing the US southern border with Mexico, many of whom then seek asylum in the United States.
Many of the changes would be dramatic shifts in how asylum seekers are treated, but would also require time-intensive regulatory procedures before they go into effect, which will likely take months.
Trump administration officials have repeatedly blamed US laws protecting asylum seekers for encouraging fraudulent or non-deserving claims.
But immigrant advocates say the Trump administration's efforts to restrict asylum protections harms people legitimately seeking refuge from violence and persecution.









