FBI special counsel Robert Mueller spoke out about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, saying Donald Trump could not have been charged due to Justice Department guidelines that bar indictments against a sitting president.
The special counsel focused most of his statement on Russia's sweeping interference operations, concluding his remarks by saying, "There were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election. And that allegation deserves the attention of every American."
Mr Mueller declined to exonerate the president since he did not have enough evidence to clear him of a crime, the special counsel noted on Wednesday, which marked his first statement made directly to the public since beginning his investigation two years ago.
The special counsel made clear he believed he was restrained from indicting a sitting president — such an action was “not an option” — because of a Justice Department legal opinion. He did not use the word ‘impeachment” but said it was Congress’ job to hold the president accountable for any wrongdoing.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” he said. “We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”
The special counsel's statement largely echoed the central points of his 448-page report released last month with some redactions. But his remarks, just under 10 minutes long and delivered from a Justice Department podium, were nonetheless extraordinary given that he had never before discussed or characterised his findings and had stayed mute during two years of feverish public speculation.
Mr Mueller, a former FBI director, said his work was complete and he was resigning to return to private life. For his rare appearance, he wore a black suit, crisp white shirt and blue tie, walking briskly onto the stage gripping a folder containing prepared remarks that he largely adhered to.
His remarks underscored the unsettled resolution, and revelations of behind-the-scenes discontent, that accompanied the end of his investigation. Mr Mueller’s refusal to reach a conclusion on criminal obstruction opened the door for William Barr, the attorney general, to clear the president, who in turn has cited the attorney general’s finding as proof of his innocence.
Mr Mueller has privately vented to Mr Barr about his handling of the report, while Mr Barr has publicly said he was taken aback by the special counsel’s decision to neither exonerate nor incriminate the president.
Under pressure to testify before Congress, Mr Mueller did not rule it out. But he seemed to warn lawmakers that they would not be pulling more detail out of him. His report is “my testimony,” he said, and he won’t go beyond what is written in it.
“So beyond what I have said here today and what is contained in our written work,” Mr Mueller said, “I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Please allow a moment for our liveblog to load
The explosive claim, which a spokesman for Mueller has emphatically denied, is “based on internal documents given to me by sources close to the Office of the Special Counsel”, according to Wolff.
Mueller’s office drew up the outline of the president’s alleged abuses, under the title “United States of America against Donald J Trump, Defendant”. The document lay on the special counsel’s desk for almost a year, according to Wolff, before he ultimately decided to shelve it.
The draft indictment, Wolff says, spells out the "extraordinary lengths" Trump took "to protect himself from legal scrutiny and accountability, and to undermine the official panels investigating his actions".
"My people think it could have been a violation, as you know. I view it differently. Perhaps [Kim] wants to get attention, and perhaps not. Who knows? It doesn't matter," he said.
Abe had said he regarded such tests as a matter of "great regret" but when Trump was asked if he was concerned, he replied: "I’m not. I personally am not."
"I am confident if you read volume II [of the Mueller report], you will be appalled at much of the conduct," Amash told his audience on the same day he posted a lengthy Twitter thread outlining his conclusions. "I was appalled by it… And we can’t let conduct like that go unchecked."
Despite Trump’s repeated claims the law would help workers by providing "rocket fuel" to the US economy, a report by the bipartisan Congressional Research Service showed it has in fact been more beneficial to investors, who have profited handsomely from a wave of corporate buybacks.
Her shares in Vulcan Materials have risen in value nearly 13 percent during that time, netting her a cool $40,000 (£31,625) gain.
Again, how's that swamp draining going Donald?
"The way that he cozies up to our enemies and abandons our allies across the globe, insults our own troops, American heroes like John McCain, it’s very hard to imagine anyone going into combat that actually trusts this commander in chief.
He acknowledged "they will want to have a discussion" about the announcement on her leadership "but, as we have always said, this is a very deep and longstanding relationship between our two countries which is obviously bigger than any prime minister, or indeed president".
Also featured in the offending piece, for which the team has apologised, were the late Fidel Castro and President Trump's dear friend Kim Jong-un.
Donald Trump is back in Washington, though he doesn’t exactly have much planned for the day.
The first thing on his schedule is an intelligence briefing set for 11:30 am, followed by a ceremonial swearing-in for the president and chairman of the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States at 12:15 pm.
He’ll then dine with Vice President Mike Pence at 12:30 pm and meet with the secretary of state at 3:30 pm. All events are listed as closed to the press, so, it looks like we won’t be seeing much of the president today.
He’s certainly been tweeting, however:






