Donald Trump has tweeted an article about a boom in European tourism as a means of continuing his attack on the US Federal Reserve, arguing domestic interest rates are too high and attacking its policy of “ridiculous quantitative tightening”, declaring: “They don’t have a clue!”
This comes after the House Judiciary Committee announced it had struck a deal with the Justice Department to gain access to redacted interview notes from FBI special counsel Robert Mueller, including “first-hand accounts of misconduct” relating to President Trump, in exchange for not immediately pursing a contempt of Congress action against attorney general William Barr.
A full session of the House of Representatives will still vote as planned on Tuesday on a resolution making it easier to sue the administration and potential witnesses if they refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas, as ex-White House counsel Don McGahn did when asked to give testimony before the Judiciary Committee on whether the president attempted to obstruct justice.
Meanwhile, Mr Trump and Joe Biden assailed each other during overlapping visits to Iowa on Tuesday, previewing what the country might get in next year’s election if Mr Biden becomes his party’s nominee.
Even before he left the White House, the president unleashed a series of schoolyard taunts, declaring that “Joe Biden is a dummy.”
Mr Biden quickly retorted that the president is “an existential threat to this country.”
The back-and-forth laid bare the rising political stakes for each, even with Election Day 2020 still about 17 months away. Mr Trump has zeroed in on Mr Biden as a potential threat to his re-election chances and is testing themes to beat him back.
Mr Biden, meanwhile, is campaigning as a front-runner, relishing the one-on-one fight with Mr Trump while making sure he doesn’t ignore the demands of the Democratic primary.
The former vice president hit Mr Trump on the economy — an issue the president often promotes as his chief strength in a time of low unemployment.
“I hope his presence here will be a clarifying event because Iowa farmers have been crushed by his tariffs toward China,” Mr Biden said. “It’s really easy to be tough when someone else absorbs the pain, farmers and manufacturers.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Please allow a moment for our liveblog to load
The vote scheduled on Tuesday will see the Democratic-controlled House consider a measure that would increase pressure on Trump by allowing the Judiciary Committee to sue the administration in federal court if needed over access to the report, effectively empowering it to enforce any further supoenas it might issue.
Chairman Jerrold Nadler said a lawsuit may yet be necessary and added that Tuesday's vote may force McGahn, who resigned in August 2018, to testify.
As part of the Trump camp's vow to fight back against congressional investigations, Barr has said he is required by law not to release evidence obtained from grand jury proceedings and grand jury materials were redacted from the section of the report dealing with Russian interference in the election.
Representative Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said the agreement indicated the Trump administration was not stonewalling Congress, adding that Democrats should focus on the threat from Russia.
"Democrats are abandoning their duty to confront foreign interference in our elections in favor of drawing out their slanderous campaign against the president," he said.
Dean was accused of orchestrating the cover-up of the Watergate scandal, before turning on his former boss and telling Congress in 1973 that President Nixon had known about it, setting in motion his resignation in disgrace a year later.
Dean told the panel there were parallels between Mueller's investigative report, released in redacted form in mid-April, and the 1974 "road map" in which a special prosecutor laid out the case against Nixon.
"Mueller has provided this committee with a road map," he said.
Lawyers for Trump said in a court filing that a 20 May decision by US district judge Amit Mehta ordering the company to comply with the subpoena was flawed and should be reversed.
Mehta's ruling was the first time a federal court waded into the tussle about how far Congress can go in probing Trump and his business affairs and marked an important victory for House Democrats.
"It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct - past or present - even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," Mehta said in his ruling.
The House of Representatives' Oversight Committee has said it needs Trump's financial records to examine whether he has conflicts of interest or broke the law by not disentangling himself from his business holdings, as previous presidents did.
Chairman Cummings issued the subpoena to Mazars after Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress in February that Trump had misrepresented his net worth.
Trump's lawyers said in Monday's filing that the subpoena was invalid because it was never intended to help Congress perform its core constitutional role of making laws.
"The committee admits that the whole point is to discover whether the President may have engaged in illegal conduct," Trump's lawyers said. "It is an effort to investigate alleged legal violations pf power that is vested in the executive, not Congress."
The president's attorneys told the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit that if it affirmed Mehta's ruling, it would be endorsing a "limitless" view of the congressional power to investigate.
The Trump Organization, the president's privately owned real estate company, is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Trump is suing in his individual capacity and is represented by a private law firm rather than government lawyers from the US Department of Justice.
Mazars has avoided taking a side in the dispute, saying it will comply with its legal obligations.
Barr said last month that he had directed John Durham, the United States attorney in Connecticut and a veteran prosecutor, to determine if law enforcement and intelligence authorities engaged in improper surveillance as they investigated potential coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign to sway the 2016 presidential election.
"It is now well-established that, in 2016, the US government and others undertook certain intelligence-gathering and investigative steps directed at persons associated with the Trump campaign," said the letter from assistant attorney general Stephen Boyd, the department's top liaison to Congress.
"As the attorney general has stated publicly at congressional hearings and elsewhere, there remain open questions relating to the origins of this counter-intelligence investigation and the US and foreign intelligence activities that took place prior to and during that investigation," the letter said.
The point of the review, Boyd added, "is to more fully understand the efficacy and propriety of those steps" and to answer open questions for the attorney general.
Barr has repeatedly said he believes there was "spying" on the Trump campaign, language President Donald Trump has seized on to support his claims that special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation was a "witch hunt." Barr has said he doesn't yet know if the "spying" was improper, but he has been unsatisfied with the answers he has received.
He has not elaborated on what specific surveillance he is troubled by. The FBI did obtain a secret warrant in 2016 from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to monitor the communications of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. That application was renewed several times.
Durham and his team will be working primarily out of Washington, with the Justice Department making existing office space available for the work, Boyd wrote to Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler.
Though the White House has granted Barr the authority to declassify documents, the Justice Department sought to assuage concerns that he would abuse that power, with Boyd saying the attorney general would prevent from disclosure information that could expose sources and methods or harm US national security interests.

“I watched Bannon a few times, four or five times over the last six months,” Trump is quoted as saying. “Nobody says anything better about me right now than Bannon… I will say this. Bannon, there is nobody that has been more respectful of the job I’m doing than Steve Bannon.”
However, the fact that he says that the "biggest part of the deal has not yet been revealed" is unlikely to help matters. It is believed there will be a "safe third country" agreement where migrants will have to submit asylum claims in Mexico rather than with US authorities.
Mexico has said that such an agreement still needs to be negotiated and that its government needs time to implement other policies to see what effect they have first.






