Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Tory Shepherd

Traditional owners expected to challenge nuclear waste facility in South Australia

Australian resources minister Keith Pitt
Resources minister Keith Pitt has confirmed that a nuclear waste facility will be built in South Australia. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP

The federal government has confirmed that a controversial nuclear waste facility will be built near Kimba, in South Australia – but the traditional owners are expected to mount a legal challenge.

The resources minister, Keith Pitt, announced two months ago that a 211-hectare site at Napandee, 24km out of Kimba, had been chosen from three potential sites to store Australia’s radioactive waste. After 60 days of further consultation, he confirmed that decision on Monday morning.

An Australian Electoral Commission ballot found more than 60% of local residents supported the facility. However, the traditional owners, the Barngarla people, say many of them missed out on the vote because they were not living in the Kimba council area.

When surveyed separately, the Barngarla voters unanimously rejected the proposal.

At the time, Barngarla Determination Aboriginal Corporation chair Jason Bilney said he planned to launch a judicial review, challenging in the supreme court the selection of Kimba over other sites.

Guardian Australia has contacted the corporation for comment.

Pitt said the government would now acquire the land to build a new facility that would store low- and medium-level medical waste that is scattered across more than 100 locations in Australia.

It would create 45 jobs, he said, and fulfil the obligation to securely store the waste.

“Nuclear medicine is used in the diagnosis of a variety of heart, lung and musculoskeletal conditions, as well as the treatment of specific cancers, and a byproduct of its production is low-level radioactive waste,” Pitt said.

“Along with the benefits comes a responsibility to manage the byproducts. Without a facility like this, we can’t enjoy the benefits from vital nuclear medicines on an ongoing basis.”

The new facility will house low-level waste permanently, and medium-level waste temporarily, until a permanent solution is found for that.

Conservationists have told a parliamentary inquiry into the future of the Lucas Heights nuclear facility that the Sydney site should be expanded to take the nation’s waste until that long-term decision is made, rather than having a new facility built.

A spokesperson for Australia’s Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, which runs Lucas Heights, welcomed Pitt’s confirmation on Monday and said the Napandee facility would be “critical infrastructure”.

“Delivery of a national facility will allow Ansto to focus on our core business of medicine production and science and innovation,” they said.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.