Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
National
Adelaide Lang

Top court fight looms over woman's terror flag charge

Sarah Mouhanna is contesting laws which ban the public diplay of terrorist organisation symbols. (Bianca De Marchi/AAP PHOTOS)

A woman accused of carrying the Hezbollah flag at a pro-Palestine rally will be the first person to challenge the validity of federal anti-terror laws.

Sarah Mouhanna has pleaded not guilty to causing a public display of a prohibited terrorist organisation symbol following a protest in the Sydney city centre on September 29, 2024.

The 20-year-old is the first person to contest national laws introduced in 2023 to stop the display of prohibited terrorist organisation symbols in public places, a court heard.

She was prepared to fight the charge in Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday, but left with a much bigger fight on her hands after the magistrate refused to preside over the landmark case.

Mouhanna's barrister said the law his client was accused of breaking was unconstitutional because it infringed on the implied freedom of political speech.

"Clearly the matter is of federal significance," Thomas Woods said.

There was also a dispute over whether the 20-year-old knew she was carrying the flag of a proscribed terrorist organisation, the court heard.

A Hezbollah flag is seen during a pro-Palestine rally (file image)
National laws introduced in 2023 ban the public display of Hezbollah's flag. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS)

Magistrate Christine Haskett said the constitutional challenge meant she could not deal with the matter, which should instead be elevated to the nation's highest court.

"I'm just concerned you've put the cart before the horse," she said.

"The High Court is the ultimate authority when dealing with the constitution. I don't have any power to deal with it."

But the commonwealth prosecutor argued the magistrate had both the power and the jurisdiction to deal with the constitutional issue, even if her decision could later be overruled by the High Court.

He said there was no guarantee the nation's highest court would hear the case and delays would result in "further fragmentation" of a matter that had been ready to proceed to a hearing.

A general view of the High Court of Australia (file image)
A magistrate has elevated the constitutional challenge to the nation's highest court. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

Both state and federal attorneys-general had been made aware of the constitutional challenge and did not move to oppose it in the local court.

Ms Haskett noted the case was significant and Mouhanna was unlikely to be the only person charged with the offence given weekly protests occurring around the nation.

"It is a major constitutional issue," she said.

The magistrate elected not to hear the case and adjourned it until November 18 after Mouhanna flagged an intention to escalate the fight to the High Court.

"We're now considering our options in a more superior court," her solicitor Hisham Karnib said after the hearing.

Mouhanna was charged after a large pro-Palestine protest that followed the expansion of Israel's offensive in Gaza into the Hezbollah stronghold of southern Lebanon.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.