Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Manchester Evening News
Manchester Evening News
Entertainment
Jessica Sansome

This Morning's Eamonn Holmes defended by ITV over Meghan Markle race criticism

Eamonn Holmes came under fire earlier this year following a heated debate about Meghan Markle on  This Morning .

But ITV have now defended the presenter after the race row errupted.

Back in August, Eamonn , who presents the daytime favourite alongside his wife Ruth Langsford, was criticised for claiming the Duchess of Sussex had an "uppity attitude" during the programme's debate titled: Is Meghan being fairly criticised?'.

A complaint about the 59-year-old's use of language was then made to broadcasting watchdog Ofcom.

During the August episode, the hosts and Canadian reporter Lainey Lui were discussing Meghan's refusal to have pictures taken whilst in the Royal box at Wimbledon.

Eammon then commented "If you have an uppity attitude, you're only through the door two minutes, and then suddenly you're sitting at Wimbledon and your royal protection people are saying 'no photographs'.

The discussion posed the question: 'Is Meghan being fairly criticised?' (ITV)

"You do know as a reporter you'd be the first writing that they are right up their own backside. You would."

Whilst the TV star did later try to clarify his comments, he was rapped by viewers for his use of the word which historically had racial connotations and according to the Cambridge Dictionary, 'an uppity person behaves in an unpleasant way because they think that they are more important than they really are.'

A spokesperson for ITV has now said the incident was a "point of learning" for the television team.

Eamonn referred to the Duchess reportedly refusing photographs being taken of her at Wimbledon (Mike Egerton/PA Wire)

They said: "Eamonn Holmes was absolutely not reprimanded for his use of the word 'uppity'. 

"Conversations took place with Eamonn and the wider production team involving an explanation of a possible interpretation of the word, which had come to light on the basis of a complaint made to the channel after the broadcast.

"Therefore this was a point of learning for the wider team, not in any way a rebuke."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.